Completed Heart, Stroke & Blood Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs

Effectiveness of Intravenous iron treatment vs standard care in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: a randomised, open-label multicentre trial (IRON-MAN)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Heart failure patients who are also iron deficient will receive intravenous iron infusions to see if this cuts hospital readmissions and deaths. Iron deficiency affects roughly half of all chronic heart failure patients and is linked to worse symptoms, poorer exercise capacity, and higher mortality—even when they are not anaemic. Current treatment guidelines are unclear because existing trials have been too small to show whether correcting iron deficiency actually reduces serious outcomes like hospitalisation or cardiovascular death. This trial will randomise patients to either IV iron or standard care, and track a combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalisation and cardiovascular mortality, while also assessing cost-effectiveness. If the treatment works, it could change international guidelines and give clinicians a straightforward, low-cost way to improve survival and quality of life for a large, vulnerable patient group. The results would also help the NHS decide whether routine iron screening and treatment in heart failure clinics is worth the investment.

View original technical description
Heart failure, acute and chronic (CHF), imposes a major burden on patients, their family and carers and the NHS. Following hospitalisation with decompensated CHF, in-hospital mortality is >10% and most will die within two years of index admission. Early readmission rates are high and quality of life often markedly impaired. Iron deficiency is common in patients with CHF and is independently associated with increased mortality and a key determinant of impaired exercise capacity, symptoms and quality of life, even in the absence of anaemia. Small, short-term studies suggest that intravenous (IV) iron improves symptoms in patients with CHF and anaemia secondary to iron deficiency. The largest study to date enrolled 459 out-patients with stable CHF and iron deficiency, with or without anaemia. Compared to placebo, treatment with IV iron (fortnightly) over 24 weeks improved symptoms, functional capacity and quality of life with an acceptable side-effect profile. However, the impact of iron on morbidity and mortality is uncertain and consequently, treatment guidelines unclear. We propose to conduct a randomised trial of IV iron compared to current standard therapy, which is powered to detect differences in the key composite endpoint of heart failure related hospitalisation and cardiovascular mortality, and to determine cost-effectiveness. This will inform both clinical management and international guidelines.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Paul Kalra (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Effectiveness of intravenous iron treatment vs standard care in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: a randomised, open-label multicentre trial (IRONMAN)
Effectiveness of intravenous iron treatment versus standard care in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency: a randomised, open label, multicentre trial [IRONMAN]
Strategies for Optimal Iron Repletion in Chronic Heart Failure and the Mechanisms of Benefit
Understanding the role of intravenous iron to treat anaemia in survivors of critical illness
INtravenous Iron and eryThropoietin to treat Anaemia following CriTical care-2 (INTACT-2): A multi-centre, randomised, parallel group, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical efficacy trial

Original classification

Clinical Study

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.