Completed Heart, Stroke & Blood Bones, Joints & Muscles

The older patients Randomised Interventional Trial in Acute non-st elevation myocardial infarction:the SENIOR-RITA trial

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Every year, thousands of older patients with a serious type of heart attack are sent home without a procedure to reopen their blocked arteries, because doctors worry the treatment might kill them. This matters because the evidence behind that caution is weak. The population is ageing, and age is a powerful predictor of death after a heart attack—the odds of dying in hospital rise by 70% for every decade of life. Among patients aged 75 and over with a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), up to half are severely frail, and those frail patients have a four-fold higher risk of death within a year. Yet many are denied coronary revascularisation (stenting or bypass surgery) simply from fear of complications. The SENIOR-RITA trial directly tests whether that fear is justified, by randomly assigning high-risk older NSTEMI patients to either revascularisation or conservative medical management, and tracking survival, quality of life, and frailty scores. If the trial shows revascularisation is safe and beneficial in this group, it could immediately change clinical guidelines and hospital protocols. Thousands of older patients each year would gain access to a treatment that currently is withheld, potentially reducing deaths and improving quality of life in a rapidly growing segment of the population.

View original technical description
Our population is ageing. Age is a powerful predictor of adverse events following acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): adjusted odds for in-hospital death increase by 70% for each 10-year increase in age. Older patients are often frail with up to a half of older patients (≥75 years) admitted with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) being severely frail. These frail older patients have a 4-fold increased risk of death at 1-year and yet are often denied coronary revascularisation because of fear of complications and causing harm. The goals of this study are to determine the benefit and risk of coronary revascularisation versus conservative management in high-risk older patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and receiving optimal medical therapy. We will explore the predictors and mechanisms of benefit and risk in relation to clinical outcomes, quality of life, and frailty scores.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Vijay Kunadian (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

The British Heart Foundation older patients with non-ST Segment elevation myocardial infarction randomized interventional treatment trial (Senior Rita).
The British Heart Foundation older patients with non-ST SEgmeNt elevatIOn myocaRdial infarction Randomized Interventional TreAtment Trial
Big data analysis of electronic hospital records: inpatient trajectories and pharmacological exposures associated with mortality in older adults.
Senotherapy to improve recovery post cardiac ischaemia reperfusion
Brain Injury outcomes using Routine Data and Imaging (BIRDI study)

Original classification

Clinical Study

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.