Women with HER2-positive early breast cancer currently receive 12 months of trastuzumab alongside chemotherapy, but this trial tests whether six months works just as well. The problem is that a full year of trastuzumab is expensive for the NHS—covering drug costs, delivery, and management of side effects like heart problems and line infections—and burdensome for patients. A small Finnish study suggested that just nine weeks of treatment produced similar disease-free survival to longer regimens, raising the question of whether the standard duration is unnecessarily long. PERSEPHONE is a randomised controlled trial comparing six months against 12 months in patients who also receive chemotherapy, either concurrently or sequentially. If six months proves equivalent to 12 months, the impact would be substantial. Halving treatment time would cut NHS drug and delivery costs significantly, reduce cardiac complications and line-related side effects, and spare patients months of hospital visits. The trial includes a health economic analysis to calculate real-world savings. This could change clinical guidelines and routine practice for HER2-positive early breast cancer across the UK.
View original technical description
DESIGN. PERSEPHONE - is a randomised controlled multi-centre clinical trial in HER-2 positive early breast cancer. The standard arm is 12 months(m)adjuvant trastuzumab, compared with the experimental arm of 6m trastuzumab. Duration of trastuzumab 12m and 6 m will be compared. The trial has an equivalence or non-inferiority hypothesis, that the 6m trastuzumab, will be equivalent to standard 12m. All patients will receive chemotherapy and trastuzumab will be given either concurrently with chemotherapy, or sequentially after chemotherapy has been completed. Patients may also receive chemotherapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Patients will be stratified by the following treatment variables (among others ):(i) Timing of trastuzumab - Concurrent/sequential with chemotherapy; (ii)Type of chemotherapy - anthracycline-based/taxane-based; (iii)Timing of chemotherapy - adjuvant /neoadjuvant. SETTING The health service setting is hospitals, predominantly outpatient and day patient facilities, with occasional use of inpatient facilities. The setting will 'map to clinical practice', and where trastuzumab and chemotherapy are being delivered at home under current arrangements, this can continue within the trial. TARGET POPULATION Patients with HER-2 positive early breast cancer (either 3+ or 2+/ FISH positive)(1), of sufficient risk to require adjuvant chemotherapy, and medically fit enough to receive chemotherapy and trastuzumab. HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES BEING ASSESSED. Adjuvant trastuzumab duration is the health technology being assessed. Trastuzumab now has a European licence for 12 months use with chemotherapy, either given concurrently or sequentially. In June 2006, NICE issued a Final Appraisal Determination (FAD) recommending 12 months use. This has very significant cost implications for the NHS in terms of drug treatment (including drug costs, and delivery), and side effects (line problems and cardiac complications). In a small Finnish [1] study, just 9 weeks of trastuzumab given concurrently with chemotherapy produced similar results for disease-free survival (HR=0.46, p=0.0078) to those seen in the larger randomised studies [2-4]. PERSEPHONE - Adjuvant is powered to look for equivalence between 6m trastuzumaband 12m treatment. The study arm would halve treatment time and potentially costs of this new health technology. MEASUREMENT OF COSTS AND OUTCOMES. Primary outcome measure of disease-free survival (DFS) will be used. An important health economic component is to be included in the study, to assess the 'real' costs of delivering the 2 durations of trastuzumab (drug costs, line and delivery costs, and costs of complications). Professor Chris McCabe (University of Warwick) will lead on the health economic component, and advise the trials team of data collection requirements prior to development of 'case record forms'. REFERENCES [1] Joensuu H et al. (FinHer Study). Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer. NEJM 2006;354 809-820. [2] Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. for Trastuzumab Adjuvant (HERA) Trial Study Team. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-2 positive breast cancer. NEJM 2005; 353: 1659-1672. [3] Romond EH et al. (Joint analysis of NSABP B31, and NCCTG N9831) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2 positive breast cancer. NEJM 2005; 353 1673-1684. [4] Slamon D, et al (BCIRG Study) Phase III Trial comparing AC-T with AC-TH and with TCH in adjuvant treatment of HER2 positive early Breast Cancer Patients: First interim efficacy analysis. Proceedings 28th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. Dec 2005 Abstract No.1.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know