Completed Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions

The Diagnosis of Urinary Tract infection in Young children (DUTY) study

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A urine test is the only reliable way to diagnose a urinary tract infection in a young child, but doctors lack clear rules for deciding which children to test and how to interpret the results. This matters because UTIs are common in children under five, but their symptoms—fever, fussiness, vomiting—overlap with many other childhood illnesses. Collecting a urine sample from a nappy-wearing child is difficult and time-consuming, so GPs need better guidance on when to bother. The current approach leads to both missed infections and unnecessary testing. The research team will build a diagnostic algorithm based on symptoms, signs, and dipstick urinalysis, then validate it in a separate group of children. They will also compare contamination rates between two common sampling methods—nappy pads and clean catch—and model the economic impact of using the algorithm versus current practice. If the algorithm works, it could reduce unnecessary urine collections and lab cultures, saving NHS resources and sparing families the hassle of repeated visits. It would also catch more real infections, preventing complications like kidney scarring. The study does not test a new treatment or device—it refines a clinical decision-making tool that quietly shapes how primary care handles a routine but consequential problem.

View original technical description
Good quality evidence regarding the externally validated predictive value of symptoms, signs and urinalysis for UTI in young children is urgently needed to help primary care clinicians better identify UTI. Furthermore, since obtaining urine samples is especially challenging in children <5 years, any resulting algorithm should be constructed to answer two separate questions. First, which children warrant urine sampling and second, can dipstick urinalysis help clinicians determine which samples should be sent for laboratory culture. The algorithm so developed will then be the subject of a validation study. In addition, since there is no evidence to help clinicians decide which urine sampling method to use, we will compare contamination rates for nappy pad and 'clean catch' sampling. Finally, since changes in the frequency with which urine samples are requested has implications for parents and the NHS, we propose to model the economic impact (from the NHS and societal perspectives) of current vs. diagnostic algorithm guided diagnosis and management with respect to the cost per correctly identified UTI and cost per symptomatic day avoided.

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Morbidity following urinary tract infection in young children: an electronic record-linked cohort study
The effectiveness and acceptability of urine collection devices to reduce contaminated urine samples in women presenting with symptoms of urinary tract infection. A three arm trial in UK primary care
Determining the feasibility of randomising children and young people to invasive and non-invasive urine sampling techniques.
Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and associated risk factors in an adult population relevant to UK primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Empirical oral AntibioticS for possible UTI in well appearing Young febrile infants (EASY).

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.