Completed Cancer Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs

A multicentre double-masked randomised non-inferiority clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis), aflibercept (Eylea) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for Macular Oedema due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (acronym: LEAVO)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Three drugs for a blinding eye condition are being tested head-to-head in a large trial across England and Wales to see whether a cheaper option works just as well as the current standard. Central retinal vein occlusion blocks the main vein draining the retina, causing fluid buildup and vision loss. The standard treatment, ranibizumab, costs the NHS thousands per dose. Bevacizumab, a drug originally developed for cancer, costs a fraction of that and is already used off-label for eye disease. But no large trial has proven whether it is non-inferior to ranibizumab for this specific condition. Aflibercept, another licensed drug, is also being compared. If bevacizumab proves non-inferior, the NHS could switch to a far cheaper treatment for thousands of patients, saving substantial drug costs without compromising vision outcomes. If it does not, the trial provides definitive evidence to justify continued spending on the more expensive drugs. Either way, the results will directly inform NHS prescribing guidelines and commissioning decisions for a common cause of blindness in older adults.

View original technical description
DESIGN: This application proposes a two year multicentre double masked pragmatic randomised controlled non-inferiority trial in macula oedema (MO) due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). One eye only of participants will be randomized to bevacizumab (Avastin) vs aflibercept (Eylea) vs ranibizumab (Lucentis) (1:1:1). SETTING: Approximately 40 Ophthalmology centres in England and Wales with expertise in retinal disorders and a proven track record in effectiveness research. TARGET POPULATION: Adults (18+) with a clinical diagnosis of MO due to CRVO within the last 12 months confirmed by subsequent fluorescein angiographic review. HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES BEING ASSESSED: Investigational treatments: Bevacizumab (Avastin, Roche) [1.25mg / 50µl](Royal Liverpool) and Aflibercept (Eylea, Bayer) [2.0mg/50µl]. Standard care: Ranibizumab (Lucentis, Novartis) [0.5mg/50µl], all administered by intravitreal injection. PROTOCOL: All patients will be screened with BCVA, clinical exam, colour fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography. EQ5D with ‘bolt ons’, VFQ 25 and resource use questionnaires will be completed at baseline. VA, clinical examination and OCT will be repeated at each visit and all tests and questionnaires at exit visit. Milestone visits at which key research data is collected will be fixed at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 52, 76 and 100. After mandated administration of treatment in all arms at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, further PRN intervention will be at 4 weekly intervals until week 24 and 4 to 8 weekly intervals thereafter until study exit and will be based on pre-defined MO retreatment criteria . There will be flexibility around the 4-8 weekly treatment only visits after week 24. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome will be change in ETDRS best corrected visual acuity letter score from baseline to 100 weeks: difference in means between bevacizumab versus ranibizumab arm and between the aflibercept versus ranibizumab arm. Secondary outcomes will include additional BCVA outcomes, differences in OCT central macular thickness and volume, changes from baseline in health related questionnaires, use of resources and adverse events. The central analysis of cost effectiveness will be mean incremental cost per QALY. SAMPLE SIZE: Bevacizumab and aflibercept are defined to be substantially inferior to ranibizumab if the primary outcome (mean change in ETDRS BCVA letter score) is worse by a margin of five letters (standard deviation= 14.3), [CRUISE study]. The null hypothesis, that bevacizumab and aflibercept are substantially inferior, will be rejected if the 95% confidence interval for the difference in treatment means lies wholly above the five letter inferiority margin. Assuming equal efficacy, there will be 80% power to reject the null hypothesis and declare non inferiority with 153 patients analysed per arm. Using nQuery Advisor 4.0 software, allowing for 15% missing data, 459 patients will be randomized. PROJECT TIMETABLE AND RECRUITMENT RATE: Proposed start date: 1st June 2014. Set up phase will be months 0-5, recruitment phase months 5-24, follow up phases months 8-48, analysis and reporting phase, months 49-53. UPDATE:The LEAVO study recruited its first patient in December 2014 and the last patient (n=463) was recruited on December 16th 2016. The study has 100 weeks of follow-up for each patient and last patient last visit will therefore occur in November 2018 and the primary outcome results of the study will be published in April 2019. As of 1st June 2018, of 463 patients recruited, 300 had successfully exited the trial at 100 weeks. The study therefore remains on track to complete as anticipated.

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

StereoTactic radiotherapy for wet Age-Related macular degeneration (STAR): A randomised, double-masked, sham- controlled, clinical trial comparing low-voltage X-ray irradiation with as needed ranibizumab, to as needed ranibizumab monotherapy
Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept 8 mg in Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
Treatment of severe Diabetic macular oedema with Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy versus treatment with Anti-VEGF followed by subthreshold Micropulse lasEr when the thickness of the central retina goes below 400 microns (DAME): a pragmatic randomised equivalence trial
A randomised controlled trial (RCT) of alternative treatments to Inhibit VEGF in patients with Age-related choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN)
Clinical Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation of Aflibercept for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (acronym CLARITY)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.