Active Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions NIHR-supported project Mental Health

Use of electronic prompts covering mental health needs in perinatal women

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Perinatal mental health screening prompts embedded in electronic maternity records are rarely completed in practice, and this study will measure exactly how often they are missed. The problem is that conditions like depression and anxiety during pregnancy and after birth remain underdiagnosed, particularly among women from different ethnic or socioeconomic backgrounds. Current digital screening tools exist within the BadgerNet system, but no one has systematically checked whether clinicians actually use them, or whether use drops off over time. This retrospective study will analyse real-world data from Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust to identify completion rates of the Whooley questions and follow-up modules, and explore variations by demographic and obstetric characteristics. If the findings confirm low and unequal use, they will directly inform the design of clinical decision-support tools that prompt clinicians more effectively. That could lead to more equitable identification and support for women experiencing perinatal mental health concerns, improving a quiet but critical part of maternity care infrastructure.

View original technical description
This retrospective observational study examines how perinatal mental health screening prompts within the BadgerNet electronic maternity records are used in practice. We will analyse data from women who booked and gave birth at Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust between January 2022 and December 2025, excluding those who delivered before 28 weeks’ gestation. The study will assess completion rates of the Whooley questions and follow-up modules (GAD-2, self-harm, wellbeing, 8-question tool), and explore variations by demographic and obstetric characteristics. We do not anticipate high completion rates of screening prompts, with limited use of follow-up tools and potential declines over time. Differences by ethnicity and socioeconomic status are expected. Findings will support the development of clinical decision-support tools in maternity care and inform improvements to digital screening processes, helping ensure more equitable identification and support for women experiencing perinatal mental health concerns.

Researchers

Richard Lilford (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Methods of assessing perinatal anxiety (MAP): The acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility of different approaches
Measuring the experience of maternity and neonatal service users - development of a maternity Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM)
Digital Assessment of Wellbeing in New Parents (DAWN-P): a feasibility study of digital screening for postnatal depression
Accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for women from Ethnic Minority groups (PAAM)
Exploring the acceptability, adoption and appropriateness of alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) in perinatal mental health services (ADAPT)

Original classification

Maternal health

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.