Completed Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs Heart, Stroke & Blood

A novel biocompatible implant for glaucoma surgery: The BioChannel device.

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A new glaucoma implant, the BioChannel, drains fluid from the eye through a tube into a hydrogel spacer that mimics the eye’s natural drainage tissue, aiming to keep pressure at 10–12 mm Hg with minimal fluctuation. Current glaucoma drainage devices often fail because scar tissue forms around the implant, blocking flow and requiring repeat surgery. The BioChannel’s spacer is made from a phosphorylcholine polymer—already used in contact lenses and coronary stents—that resists protein buildup and cell adhesion, suppressing scar formation. The device can be implanted in about ten minutes, with tube placement taking just 30 seconds, compared to several minutes for existing devices. If successful, the BioChannel could dramatically reduce surgical failure rates and the need for follow-up procedures. For patients, this means more reliable long-term pressure control and a quicker, less technically demanding operation. For the NHS, it could lower the burden of repeat surgeries and associated costs. The project will produce the documentation needed for clinical trials and regulatory approval, with manufacturing scaled up through a third-party company.

View original technical description
The BioChannel will maintain an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 10-12 mm Hg with minimal 24-hour variation. The device is designed to address the limitations of currently used glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) (Appendix page-2). The BioChannel comprises a tube to drain fluid from the anterior chamber into a spacer flap that mimics the trabecular meshwork to allow aqueous flow to seep into the subconjunctival space. Key innovations include: (1) The spacer flap is fabricated from a phosphorylcholine (PC) polymer. PC polymers have been shown since the early 1990s to have an excellent clinical record with several registered products including contact lens and coronary stents. PC polymers are clinically proven to be resistant to protein absorption. This results in reduced cell adhesion and activation to suppress capsule formation and fibrosis. Any capsule formation that might occur over time with the BioChannel spacer is anticipated to be much easier to remove than is possible with any of the currently used GDDs. PC materials are also resistant to bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. (2) Pressure control is achieved by the tube from the anterior chamber draining into the PC hydrogel spacer. Pressure control will be optimised by correlating spacer dimensions, internal placement of the tube and hydrogel properties with different aqueous flow properties. The hydrogel structure of the spacer mimics the network structure of the trabecular meshwork to allow outflow over the entire surface of the spacer. (3) Implantation of the BioChannel will be accomplished in an approximately 10 minute period by insertion into the subconjunctival space in a manner analogous to that of an intraocular lens inserted during cataract surgery. The PC polymer can be compacted without sticking to itself. This enables a new insert technique for tube placement (30 seconds) which is much more accurate and rapid compared to current GDD placement methods which require several minutes and considerable surgical skill (Appendix page-2). The project comprises of three work packages (WPs) with clearly defined milestones. A detailed Gantt chart is attached. WP1 is designed to establish the documentation needed for eventual clinical trials, regulatory approvals and introduction to the NHS. Discussions will be initiated with appropriate device manufacturers to complete contract negotiations by the end WP1 to manufacture the BioChannel. Technical efforts will include continued prototyping which has already been initiated to optimise BioChannel outflow and pressure maintenance properties. Device fabrication, sterilisation and physicochemical characterisation will also be conducted to provide the necessary datasets required for technology transfer for manufacturing and for the documentation required for regulatory approvals (Technical File). An externally funded PoC study will be conducted. This in vivo testing framework provides considerable lift to our proposal since the contributing costs are >10% of the total application. WP2 is designed to scale up device manufacture with a 3rd party company and to complete preclinical development. Demonstration batches will be bench tested to ensure functional and material properties are met; GMP documentation prepared; GMP qualified analytical methods developed and validated; GMP batches tested pre & post sterilization using quality tests identified by the Target Product Profile (TPP); Stability studies to support product & clinical trial (accelerated & long term); Pre-clinical GLP biocompatibility studies meeting ISO 10993 (externally funded) including at 12 week implant study anticipated in pigs. WP3 will include completion of the Clinical Utility Review, Design Dossier & Technical File, GP letter, consent forms and Patient Information Sheets (PIS), IRAS forms, and Clinical Engineering and Notified Body preliminary reviews. All necessary documentation will be submitted to appropriate ethical committees to

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Contact lens device for the continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure
Development and clinical evaluation of FibroFix Cartilage: a load bearing, tissue regenerative knee cartilage resurfacing implant
A novel endotracheal tube to reduce incidence of post-intubation stenosis and ventilator associated pneumonia in children and adults requiring artificial ventilation.
Fluid-Gels as Resorbable Protective Dressings for Ocular Surface Disease
Development of next-generation Intraocular lens combined with degradable drug delivery system toward prevention of Posterior Capsule Opacification

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.