Active Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions Heart, Stroke & Blood

Evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of using a more permissive blood pressure target to guide careful titration of vasoactive agents in critically ill children with hypotension: PRotocolised Evaluation of permiSSive blood pressure targets versus Usual caRE (PRESSURE)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A large clinical trial is testing whether allowing critically ill children to have lower-than-normal blood pressure while they receive life-saving drugs reduces their risk of death and time on a ventilator. Low blood pressure in children in intensive care is typically treated aggressively, with doctors aiming to bring it up to the average for a healthy child of the same age. But the drugs used to raise blood pressure can themselves cause harm, including reduced blood flow to organs. Current guidelines are based on weak evidence, and no randomised controlled trial has ever tested whether a more cautious approach—targeting the lowest safe blood pressure—could be better. If the trial shows that a permissive blood pressure target is superior, it could change standard practice in paediatric intensive care units worldwide. Children would receive lower doses of vasoactive drugs for shorter periods, potentially reducing organ damage, shortening hospital stays, and improving long-term outcomes. The study also includes a full economic evaluation, so funders and hospitals would know whether the approach saves money or provides better value for the health system.

View original technical description
Research question In critically ill children with hypotension [Population], is a strategy of permissive blood pressure targets (MAP target of 5th centile for age/gender/height), [Intervention] in order to minimise dose and duration of therapy (e.g. vasoactive drugs), superior to usual care [Comparator] in terms of a composite outcome of mortality and days of ventilator support at 30 days (clinical effectiveness) and incremental costs, QALYs and net monetary benefit at 12 months (cost-effectiveness) [Outcome]? Background Low blood pressure (hypotension) is a key feature of shock, which occurs in a number of disease states commonly encountered in PICU. Untreated, hypotension impairs tissue perfusion and organ function, with increased risk of death and organ failure and poor neurological outcome in survivors. Treatment is by the administration of fluid boluses and infusions of vasoactive drugs. Though these interventions may be lifesaving, they also carry potential for harm. Excessive fluids are associated with prolonged PICU stay and increased mortality. Vasoactive drugs induce vasoconstriction and may reduce blood flow, causing secondary effects on cardiac, mesenteric, metabolic, microbiome and immune function. Hypotension is a major trigger for treatment, with most current guidelines recommending targeting 50th centile BP for age; whereas in adults 5th centile is now routinely targeted. Unfortunately, current guidelines for blood pressure targets in children are based on low quality evidence consisting mainly of single centre retrospective observational studies. There have been no randomised controlled trials. The purpose of PRESSURE is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive hypotension (MAP target 5th centile for age and gender whilst receiving vasoactive drugs) in critically ill children with hypotension. Aims and objectives To evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive blood pressure targets (MAP target 5th centile for age and gender whilst receiving vasoactive drugs) in critically ill children with hypotension on: composite outcome of mortality and duration of organ support at 30 days (rank- based analysis with death ranked as worse than 30 days of organ support); incremental costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and net monetary benefit at 12 months; incremental costs at 30 days; mortality at PICU discharge, 30 days, 90 days and 12 months; duration of survival to 12 months; time to liberation from invasive ventilation; duration of organ support; length of PICU and hospital stay; functional status at PICU discharge and at 12 months; and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) at 12 months. Methods Pragmatic data-enabled multi-centre, open randomised clinical trial with internal pilot phase and integrated economic evaluation. Timelines for delivery 01/08/2020 to 31/01/2025 (54 months). Anticipated impact and dissemination The results will be disseminated actively and extensively, both in terms of progress during the trial period and results at the end of the study. The outputs for PRESSURE will include meeting and conference presentations (international and national) of study progress and results; publication of the study; and incorporation into clinical guidelines. These separate outputs will be targeted at relevant stakeholders in formats suitable for the target audience. This will ensure that the potential benefit and impact of the PRESSURE trial is maximised.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

PRESSURE: PRotocolised Evaluation of permiSSive blood pressure targets versus Usual caRE. Evaluating theclinical and cost effectiveness of using a permissive blood pressure target to guide titration of vasoactive drugs incritically ill children with hypotension
PRotocolised Evaluation of permiSSive blood pressure targets versus Usual caRE. Evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of using a permissive blood pressure target to guide titration of vasoactive drugs in critically ill children with hypotension.
PRESSURE: PRotocolised Evaluation of permiSSive blood pressure targets versus Usual caRE. Evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of using a permissive blood pressure target to guide titration of vasoactive drugs in critically ill children with hypotension.
Paediatric Intensive Care Adaptive Platform Trial (PIVOTAL)
PRotocolised Evaluation of PermiSSive hypotension versus Usual caRE: PRESSURE

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.