Thousands of COPD patients in the UK take the antibiotic azithromycin daily to prevent dangerous lung attacks, but no one knows whether they should stop after a year, pause during summer, or stay on it indefinitely. This matters because azithromycin is a valuable but imperfect treatment—long-term antibiotic use risks resistance and side effects, yet stopping it might trigger a sudden flare-up. The current guidelines offer no clear answer. The OPACE trial will randomly assign 1,311 stable COPD patients to one of three groups: continue azithromycin year-round, stop completely, or stop only during summer months when infections are rarer. An adaptive design allows dropping a treatment arm if it proves futile partway through. If the trial shows that seasonal or complete discontinuation is safe—meaning patients do not experience more exacerbations than those who stay on the drug—it could change NHS prescribing guidelines overnight. Patients would avoid unnecessary antibiotics, reduce their risk of resistance and side effects, and save the health service money. The results will also reveal which patient subgroups (based on lung function, smoking history, or blood eosinophil counts) respond best to each strategy, enabling more personalised COPD care.
View original technical description
BACKGROUND Prophylactic azithromycin is recommended as a treatment to reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations in people with COPD, at high risk of exacerbations. There is much uncertainty in how to use this valuable treatment in managing COPD. It is unknown whether azithromycin is effective beyond one-year of treatment or what happens when azithromycin is discontinued following a period of use, or temporarily stopped over the summer when there are fewer exacerbations. Whether there are differences in treatment responsiveness between subgroups of people with COPD is uncertain. AIM To evaluate benefits and risks of azithromycin prophylaxis vs complete or seasonal discontinuation in people with stable COPD at high risk of exacerbations and assess these effects in patient subgroups. METHODS DESIGN: Randomised double-blind, non-inferiority, adaptive-design trial of 3 parallel arms (continued azithromycin prophylaxis as standard of care vs complete discontinuation, vs seasonal discontinuation) in patients with stable COPD at high risk of exacerbations. Internal pilot to evaluate recruitment will run for 9 months. Randomisation allocation will be 1:1:1. Adaptive design means a treatment arm can be dropped if futile at interim analysis, but remaining arms continue. SETTING: GP practices, hospitals, specialist community clinics. TARGET POPULATION: Stable COPD patients prescribed azithromycin>=3 months to reduce risk of COPD exacerbations. INTERVENTIONS ASSESSED Continued azithromycin (standard of care), complete discontinuation (matched placebo), seasonal discontinuation (azithromycin October-March, matched placebo April-September). TRIAL INVOLVEMENT Median follow up of 31 months, 24 months minimum for last participant recruited. Participants will have 4 visits (in person or remote, depending on participant’s preference) and 4 phone calls. Participants will have active follow up till completed their visits and will remain on trial medication unless experience >3 exacerbations/year. Participants can restart their regular azithromycin prescription after stopping trial medication if advised by their GP/specialist. Secondary outcomes will be collected over the entire trial providing long-term perspective of interventions. OUTCOMES Primary endpoint Time to first exacerbation (TTFE) requiring additional treatment with antibiotics and/or corticosteroids. Secondary endpoints include Number/rate and severity of exacerbations, length of exacerbation-free status Health related quality of life Cost effectiveness from NHS perspective SAMPLE SIZE 1311 patients (437 per arm) to be recruited. Assuming a median TTFE of 150 days and non-inferiority threshold of 30 days shorter, this equates to the threshold on the hazard ratio scale of 1.25. Sample size is based on 90% power for two non-inferiority comparisons (seasonal and placebo compared with continuous as standard treatment), at 2.7% significance using a Cox proportional hazards model. Pre-specified subgroup analysis includes exacerbations history, FEV1%, smoking, CAT score, blood eosinophils. TIMETABLE Total trial duration 53 months. Pilot 9 months; recruitment period 29 months; median follow up 31 months. Interim analysis at 18 months. IMPACT This trial will provide evidence to shape guidelines and change current practice. It will enable a precision medicine approach; optimising azithromycin use in COPD care. Results will be shared with patients, clinicians, and stakeholders.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know