Active Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs Cancer

BEST4: A Platform Trial to determine whether capsule sponge-biomarker technology reduces mortality from oesophageal cancer

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A simple, swallowable sponge on a string could save thousands of lives by catching oesophageal cancer early enough to cure it. Oesophageal cancer is notoriously deadly because it is usually diagnosed too late for effective treatment. The current system fails to identify the pre-cancerous condition, Barrett’s oesophagus, in time. A large trial called BEST3 showed that offering the Cytosponge test to people on heartburn medication detected ten times more cases of Barrett’s oesophagus than standard care, and found early-stage cancers that are almost never caught in routine practice. But that trial did not measure whether the test actually reduces deaths. This new BEST4 platform trial will answer that question directly. It will randomise thousands of people in the community to either receive an offer of the Cytosponge or continue with usual care, then track whether oesophageal cancer mortality falls. Running alongside it, a separate study will test whether the same sponge sample, combined with a panel of clinical and molecular markers, can accurately predict which patients with Barrett’s oesophagus will go on to develop cancer. If successful, the Cytosponge could become a national screening programme, transforming a cancer with a grim prognosis into one that is routinely caught and cured.

View original technical description
This study has joint funding between NIHR HTA and CRUK (total funding is £6m). Oesophageal cancer (OAC) is a poor prognosis cancer, and the current clinical pathways are ineffective for early diagnosis. Since endoscopic therapy for dysplasia and early cancer occurring in the premalignant condition Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is now highly effective, the time is ripe for improving methods to identify those patients at high risk of requiring treatment. We have developed a novel, minimally invasive diagnostic test called Cytosponge, which can be coupled with a molecular biomarker for BO called Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3). Over the past 18 years, we have rigorously tested the Cytosponge in a series of clinical trials and the results have surpassed expectations. In the recent CRUK-funded BEST3 randomised controlled trial which enrolled >13,000 individuals who were on a repeat prescription for acid-suppressant medications in primary care, we showed that the detection of BO over one year in those offered a Cytosponge test (intervention arm) was ten-fold higher than with usual care. The Cytosponge also led to the detection of early-stage curable cancers, which are rare in routine practice. However, the BEST3 study was not designed to look at the impact of the Cytosponge on mortality and this information will be crucial before adopting this test into a national population-based targeted screening programme. Cytosponge-TFF3 screening will lead to the identification of many individuals with previously undiagnosed non-dysplastic BO (NDBO), many of whom may not progress to OAC throughout their lifetime. A further question arises as to how these individuals should be best managed. We have previously shown that the Cytosponge sample can be combined with a biomarker panel, encompassing clinical, molecular, and histological biomarkers, which was able to accurately stratify patients according to their risk of cancer progression. However, our previous study was not validated prospectively. In this BEST4 platform, we propose a large, randomised trial conducted in the community setting to evaluate the effectiveness of an offer of a Cytosponge to patients on medication for heartburn symptoms and whether it could improve OAC-associated mortality. Additionally, we plan to conduct a prospective cohort study, which will run in parallel to the randomised study to evaluate whether the Cytosponge can be coupled with a multidimensional, but clinically applicable, biomarker panel in the surveillance of patients with NDBO. We, therefore, envisage that this BEST4 platform could lead to validation of a Cytosponge-based screening and surveillance strategy for BO and OAC that, if successful, would be a step-change for the field. Additionally, we hope to create a platform for basic, clinical, and epidemiological research into BO and OAC. This would include a longitudinal tissue bank of Cytosponge, saliva and blood samples in patients undergoing endoscopy; and the opportunity for trials of lifestyle interventions for patients with GORD and chemoprevention among patients with BO.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Risk Stratification of Non-Dysplastic Barrett’s Oesophagus Using a Minimally Invasive Device, the Cytosponge, Coupled with a Multi-Dimensional Biomarker Panel
BEST4 Screening Trial Barrett's oESophagus Trial 4 (BEST4): A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing capsule sponge Test Screening to Usual Care
Barrett’s oESophagus Trial 4 (BEST4): A Prospective Cohort trial for the Surveillance of Barrett’s Oesophagus using a capsule sponge test and biomarker panel
Barrett’s oESophagus Trial 4 (BEST4): A Randomised Control Trial Comparing capsule sponge Test Screening to Usual Care
Psychological and behavioural aspects of Cytosponge screening for Barrett’s oesophagus: generating evidence to inform implementation

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.