Active Lungs & Breathing Mental Health

PrimaryBreathe: programme to develop and test a brief remote primary care intervention for chronic breathlessness

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

One in ten people live with breathlessness that disrupts their daily lives, yet most receive only disease-focused treatment that often falls short. This five-year programme aims to develop and test a brief, remote intervention for chronic breathlessness that can be delivered by primary care staff, regardless of a patient’s underlying diagnosis or disease stage. The problem is that current specialist breathlessness services—which use breathing techniques, relaxation, and incremental activity—are largely limited to palliative care for advanced cancer, leaving most patients without access. Rehabilitation programmes exist but are not always accessible or acceptable. This research addresses the gap by translating evidence-based symptom management into a form that general practices can deliver using existing resources. If the intervention proves effective, it could enable a step-change in access to support for the growing number of people with chronic breathlessness, particularly older adults with multiple long-term conditions. The work includes developing implementation strategies to facilitate roll-out across UK primary care, potentially reducing emergency hospital attendances and improving quality of life for a symptom that currently contributes to one in five emergency department visits by ambulance.

View original technical description
Background Breathlessness affects the daily lives of one in ten people, and a quarter of adults aged over 70. Many people with long-term conditions suffer from this trans-diagnostic symptom, particularly those with chronic lung or heart disease. With an aging, increasingly multimorbid population, the global burden of breathlessness is rising inexorably, compounded by COVID-19. This debilitating and distressing symptom often leads to crisis calls for help; breathlessness contributes to one in five emergency department attendances by ambulance. Clinicians manage breathlessness by focusing on treatment of underlying disease. Although a necessary first step, this approach alone is often insufficient, due to the weak relationship between disease and symptom severity. Rehabilitation programmes help, but are not always accessible or acceptable for patients. Specialist breathlessness services have emerged within palliative care over the last decade, using approaches like breathing techniques, relaxation and incremental activity. These evidence-based services mostly support people with advanced disease, particularly cancer, and capacity is highly limited. We hypothesise that breathless patients will benefit from symptom-directed self-management support, irrespective of diagnosis, disease stage or postcode. To enable widespread access to this, we propose a five-year programme to develop and test a primary care intervention for chronic breathlessness. Objectives Co-design a brief intervention that translates specialist breathlessness management into a deliverable form for primary care. Determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Develop an implementation strategy to facilitate roll-out across UK primary care using existing resources. Methods Workstream 1 contains three developmental studies. Checklists will be developed to optimise medical management of the main diseases causing breathlessness (study 1A). In a multiphase qualitative study, the two-step PrimaryBreathe intervention, involving primary care staff receiving online training and then delivering a 4-week intervention, will be co-designed with stakeholders (study 1B). Single-arm trial feasibility testing will occur in two diverse regions (study 1C). Workstream 2 comprises a cluster randomised trial to test intervention clinical and cost-effectiveness (study 2A), incorporating a parallel process evaluation (study 2B). Forty general practices across five UK regions will be cluster randomised, with 640 patients receiving either the breathlessness intervention with concurrent optimal medical management, or optimal medical management alone. The primary endpoint will be the change in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire Mastery Scale at 6 weeks. Secondary measures include emergency hospital and primary care attendances. Workstream 3 aims to facilitate future roll-out of the intervention, if effective, as well as stand-alone outputs such as the optimal medical management checklists and subsidiary patient-information app. Evidence from patients, carers and primary care staff will be integrated with the strategic perspectives of managers, commissioners and relevant national organisations to co-produce an implementation strategy (study 3). Information from two cross-cutting themes, on implementation enablers and on ethnic minority inclusivity, will be incorporated into the strategy. This work will enable a step-change in access to support for people suffering from chronic breathlessness. It has been endorsed by national and international stakeholders including the Asthma UK / British Lung Foundation, Primary Care Respiratory Society, British Thoracic Society and International Primary Care Respiratory Group.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Primary Breathe. Development and Evaluation of a Primary Care Intervention to optimise chronic breathlessness
Improving the lives of people living with chronic breathlessness due to advance disease via a self-guided, internet-based breathlessness supportive intervention SELF-BREATHE
Living well with chronic breathlessness: Improving the sustained use of supported self-management strategies
A self-guided, internet-based intervention for patients with chronic breathlessness (SELF - BREATHE)
Development and refinement of a clinician consultation-aide intervention to support effective chronic breathlessness discussions with patients and their family carers

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.