Active Lungs & Breathing Public Health & Healthcare

Long-term Follow-Up for chronic rhinosinusitis patients in the MACRO Trial: MACRO PLUS

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A five-year follow-up of 514 chronic rhinosinusitis patients will determine whether a three-month course of antibiotics or sinus surgery provides lasting relief. Chronic rhinosinusitis—persistent inflammation of the sinuses—affects roughly one in ten UK adults, causing facial pain, nasal blockage, and reduced quality of life. The original MACRO trial compared three treatments: prolonged antibiotics, endoscopic sinus surgery, and standard medical therapy. But six-month results may not capture the full picture for a chronic condition. This extension tracks the same patients for five years, asking which treatment holds up best over time and at what cost to the NHS and patients. If the five-year data confirm that surgery or long-course antibiotics remain superior to standard care, the team will update NHS treatment pathways and international guidelines. This could reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics—a key driver of antimicrobial resistance—and cut variations in care across GP surgeries and hospitals. The health-economic model will also tell commissioners which option delivers the best value for money over the long term, helping the NHS allocate resources more effectively for a common, debilitating condition.

View original technical description
Research question What is the long-term evidence for effectiveness of a long course of antibiotics or sinus surgery in the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)? Background The NIHR PGfAR funded MACRO Programme set out to establish which treatments work best for adults with CRS and to ensure they are adopted as best practice by GPs and specialists. We have completed an RCT comparing clarithromycin (3 months), placebo (3 months) and surgery simultaneously recruiting a total sample of 514 patients with SNOT-22 (patient-rated outcome measure) as the main study outcome. In CRS, long-term follow-up over 5 years shows a clearer picture of the impacts on patients. Aims and Objectives Establish the long-term effectiveness of a prolonged course of antibiotics and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in adult patients with CRS in terms of symptomatic improvement and costs to the NHS and patients. Update the decision model for the MACRO cost-effectiveness analysis comparing long course of antibiotics, sinus surgery, and appropriate medical therapy alone using 5-year follow-up data to provide more accurate results regarding the most cost-effective pathway. Consider the MACRO Programme evidence and synthesise this with evidence collected during the MACRO PLUS 5-year follow-up period, to update the ideal patient pathway for the management of patients with CRS in the NHS, across primary and secondary care, as developed through WS3 of the MACRO Programme. Methods We propose a long-term follow up of MACRO trial participants that will enable us to assess the impact of the treatment options at 5 years and allow the team to update their recommendations on the best pathway for treating people with CRS and to effectively inform patients of the recommendations. This will include refining the health economic decision analytic model comparing the three treatments used in the MACRO trial. Overall, this research will define the most effective and cost-effective treatments for CRS patients within the NHS, minimizing the impact of disease, and reducing variations in patient care and ineffective use of healthcare resources, including inappropriate use of antibiotics. Timelines for delivery The study will continue from the end of the existing MACRO Programme (finishing December 2025) and enable collection of all included participants 5-year data, the last of which is due to be returned by October 2028. Following this, the data will be analysed to determine if the 6-month findings and related recommendations have changed, and if so how. Anticipated Impact and Dissemination Due to the chronicity of the disease, 5-year data will provide a robust long-term assessment of the trial interventions and feed into international guidelines and evidence including the European Position Paper on Sinusitis and Nasal Polyps and the International Consensus Statement on Rhinology & Allergy. We will aim to publish the outcomes in a high impact journal and disseminate at international conferences. In conjunction with our PPI panel, we will set out a strategy to inform CRS patients of our findings and GPs and ENT specialists of our recommendations for the management of the condition in both settings.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Defining best Management for Adults with Chronic RhinOsinusitis: the MACRO Programme
The Management for Adults with Chronic RhinOsinusitis (MACRO)
PRimary care Infection Management for Everyday practice (PRIME)
Airway microbiome driven mechanisms of disease after optimised self management: Colour-COPD trial
Exploring endotypes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis (ExpRess)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.