Active Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions Public Health & Healthcare

What evidence-based standardised health, education and social care offer and model of care should be provided for children with neurodisability and their families, and what would be needed to ensure a localised version can be provided efficiently at scale and individualised to reduce inequity?

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Children with neurodisability and their families often face a fragmented patchwork of NHS, education, and social care services that vary wildly by location and rarely meet their needs. This 15-month development project aims to design a larger research programme that will determine what a standardised, evidence-based package of integrated care should look like—and how it can be delivered efficiently at scale while still being tailored to individual families. The problem is stark: despite policy promises of a "local offer" of joined-up care, no one has systematically identified what that offer should contain, how to measure its quality, or how to ensure it reaches underserved groups—including families from ethnic minorities and those in deprived areas. The researchers will work directly with parent carers, disabled young people, and professionals from health, education, and social care to co-create the methodology. They will survey what is currently delivered versus what families actually want, and identify which outcome domains matter most. If this succeeds, the subsequent full research programme could produce a replicable model of care that reduces inequity—meaning a child in a Core20PLUS area would have the same chance of getting timely, coordinated support as a child in a wealthy suburb.

View original technical description
Background Children with neurodisability and their families require timely support from the NHS, education, and social care. Improving the efficiency, equity, and quality of services received through local offers of integrated care is an expressed policy priority. Our PGfAR will address the research question: What evidence-based standardised health, education and social care offer and model of care should be provided for children with neurodisability and their families, and what would be needed to ensure a localised version can be provided efficiently at scale and individualised to reduce inequity? This question arose from parent and professional priorities including from British Academy of Childhood Disability (BACD), RCPCH Specialist Group. Aims 1. Undertake creative and inclusive PPI that identifies underserved groups not well represented in our existing PPI strategies, and to work with people whose voices are not traditionally heard. 2. Establish and cultivate a community of childhood disability Early Career Researchers from health, education, and social care. 3. Understand what health, education and social care is offered to children and parent carers, what they receive, and what they want. 4. Work with parent carers and professionals to identify which outcome domains are important to measure in the PGfAR. 5. Co-create the detailed methodology and research design of the workstreams for the substantive PGfAR. Development work WP1 Implement our multi-pronged PPI strategy with young disabled people and parent carers utilising socially and ethnically diverse groups around the country, and how we can engage with potentially under-represented groups. WP2 Build on our existing BACD-Castang Strategic Research Programme for national multi-sector and disciplinary teams/collaborations. Identify and cultivate a community of childhood disability Early Career Researchers from medical, allied health, public health, social care, and education backgrounds. WP3 Undertake a scoping review of content of multiagency Local Offers of care to disabled children. Conduct a survey with professionals and parent carers regarding components and models of care; including what is delivered and what parent carers would like to receive, including innovative practice. Interview a subset of participants, purposively sampling parent carers from underserved and less heard communities. WP4 Convene iterative online/in-person consultation workshops with parent carers and professionals to discuss what to measure as indictors of quality of care. Identify what NHS, education and social care routine data sources might provide useful data for the PGfAR. WP5 Design the subsequent PGfAR to focus on evaluating innovative components and models of health, education and social care that parent carers report as valuable are associated with good health and wellbeing and quality of care outcomes. Identify diverse candidate UK areas to join the PGfAR, including areas with underserved NHS CorePLUS20 populations. Timelines Duration 15 months: 1.5.25 - 31.7.26. Existing BACD-Castang funds will support co-design development work from 1.12.24. Anticipated impact and dissemination Timely submission of high-quality PGfAR 2026/27. Each PDG WP will deliver standalone outputs, and utility for the PGfAR. Dissemination of research findings through parent carer and professional groups using online content, newsletters, scientific publications.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Creating evidence for health improvement and health protection policies and practice in UK Early Years Settings: the EARLY study
AEGIS: Advancing equity for children and young people seeking asylum and refugees: a blueprint for generalisable interventions
A partnership for community-led health behaviour change research in areas of high socio-economic disadvantage
Access to healthcare for disabled and neurodiverse children and young people from underserved and underrepresented communities
Improving the long-term care of patients who have had bariatric surgery: PROMISE CARE study

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.