Active Psychology & Behaviour Public Health & Healthcare

Making clinical trials more inclusive by using behavioural science to improve communication: COMMCLUSIVE

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Recruiters in clinical trials spend less time and use poorer techniques when discussing studies with patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds, a finding that directly undermines the inclusiveness of medical research. This matters because patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage are persistently left out of clinical trials, making research findings less generalisable and risking health inequalities. Poor communication is a key barrier, yet no practical tools exist to help recruiters improve how they talk about trials with these patients. The COMMCLUSIVE project will develop an open-access online toolkit—including guidance, e-learning modules, and videos—to support recruiters in communicating inclusively. The toolkit is grounded in behavioural science theory, ensuring its approach is reproducible and transparent. A feasibility study within four host trials will refine the toolkit and lay the groundwork for a future full-scale evaluation of its effect on trial inclusivity and recruitment. If successful, this research could change how clinical trials communicate with underserved populations, making the evidence base for new treatments more representative and reducing research waste. The toolkit would be freely available through high-profile platforms such as the NIHR INCLUDE website and The Clinical Trials Toolkit.

View original technical description
Background Clinical trials need to be inclusive to make research findings generalisable, minimise health and social care inequalities, increase trust in research, and avoid research waste. Patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage are persistently underserved in trials. Poor communication is a key barrier to their inclusion. Making changes to the content and presentation of verbal communication can increase patient understanding and recruitment. I led the CO-ACT study, which found that recruiters spent less time and used sub-optimal techniques to discuss trials with patients living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Improving how trials are verbally communicated is an unexplored, yet promising approach to make trials accessible. I will develop an online toolkit, including guidance, e-learning, and videos to support recruiters to communicate inclusively. I will use behaviour science theory to develop the toolkit, offering an effective, reproducible, transparent and generalisable approach to addressing trial conduct challenges. I will conduct a feasibility study to refine the toolkit and contribute data to, and inform, a future full-scale evaluation of the toolkit's effect on trial inclusivity and recruitment. Aims and objectives 'COMMCLUSIVE' aims to make trials accessible to patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage by optimising communication. Objectives: 1. Establish a) communication preferences of patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage and b) communication goals and intentions of recruiters (Phase A). 2. Develop an online toolkit, including guidance, e-learning and videos to support recruiters in communicating inclusively (Phase B). 3. Conduct a feasibility study within four trials (SWATs), including qualitative process evaluation (Phase C). The study will refine the toolkit and contribute data to, and inform, a future full-scale evaluation of the toolkit's effect on trials inclusivity and recruitment. Methods and timelines I will complete the 3-year Fellowship over 45 months at 80% FTE. Behavioural science will guide this mixed methods project. Key stakeholders, particularly patients and recruiters, will inform three phases: A. Qualitative study (21 Months @ 80%FTE [1-21]) Interviews with ~25-30 adult patients experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage and ~15-20 trial recruiters. Findings will inform the development of the toolkit. B. Co-develop toolkit (6 Months @ 80%FTE [22-27]) Consult with stakeholders via meetings and user-testing to develop and package the toolkit, including guidance, e-learning and videos. C. Feasibility study, qualitative process evaluation, and dissemination (18 Months @ 80% FTE [28-45]) Conduct a feasibility SWAT to refine the toolkit and contribute data to, and inform, a future full-scale evaluation of the toolkit. The feasibility study will involve a cluster randomised (by site) controlled design with four host trials and qualitative process evaluation. Anticipated impact and dissemination I will create an open access toolkit, including e-learning, guidance and videos, to support recruiters to communicate inclusively about trials. Longer term, this will improve the quality and accessibility of the evidence-base for trials communication, supporting NIHR's strategies to enhance trials inclusivity and recruitment. I will make research findings generalisable to target populations to minimise inequalities. Outputs will be shared through a webinar, embedding the toolkit in high-profile websites (e.g. NIHR INCLUDE and The Clinical Trials Toolkit), conference presentations, journal articles, patient/public summaries, and infographics.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Behavioural Optimisation and Operational Strategies for Trials: The BOOST Approach
Promoting Accessibility in Clinical Trials (PRACTICALs): Development and pilot testing of an eLearning resource
Barriers and facilitators to EQUitable participation and engagement in research using digitAl Trial mEthods: A qualitative exploration with the public, patients, and staff (EQUATE)
Improving the recruitment of females to clinical trials; A mixed methods study using co-production to generate evidence-based recommendations.
Transitioning from Feasibility to Main trial: transparent Reporting of Modifications and Adaptations of Trial design Elements (TRANSFoRMATE)

Original classification

Career Development

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.