Completed Lungs & Breathing Public Health & Healthcare

COPD in primary care: from case finding to improving patient outcomes

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Around half a million people in the UK have COPD but have not been diagnosed, and this programme will test whether actively searching for these missing cases is worth the cost. COPD is a major drain on the NHS and the economy, yet doctors still lack reliable tools to predict how the disease will progress in individual patients, especially those with mild or moderate disease. Most existing research has focused on people with advanced COPD, leaving a gap in knowledge about the early stages and about how the condition affects working-age adults. If this research succeeds, it could change how the NHS identifies COPD patients, shifting from waiting for people to seek help to proactively finding them. A better prognostic index would help GPs make more informed treatment decisions for the majority of COPD patients treated in primary care. The work on employment and occupational health could lead to workplace interventions that keep people in work longer. The pilot exercise programme for mild COPD could pave the way for a definitive trial on whether physical activity can slow disease progression.

View original technical description
BackgroundCOPD is an important health problem, accounting for significant health service and societal costs. However the natural history and factors affecting prognosis are poorly understood and interventions for early disease are limited. There is also considerable underdiagnosis, resulting in potential unmet need. In the UK there is interest in identifying these missing cases with diverse local initiatives, but no evidence of the most efficient approach. This programme comprises 4 workpackages (WP) to address some of these issues. Aims & objectivesThe overall aim is to set up a primary care COPD cohort including the full range of disease severity, as a platform for testing novel health service interventions. Specifically to:1. Ascertain the cost-effectiveness of the addition of active case finding, compared with opportunistic-only case finding for COPD in primary care (WP1)2. Test the validity of existing COPD prognostic indices in a primary care COPD population and develop an improved prognostic index (WP2)3. Identify factors associated with employment, absenteeism and presenteeism among those with COPD of working age (WP3)4. Assess feasibility and benefits of formal occupational health assessment among those with poor work performance (WP3)5. Assess feasibility and acceptability of a pilot intervention to promote home-based exercise among COPD patients with mild dyspnoea and mild/moderate airflow obstruction (WP4)Research plans & outputsWP1 is a randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of active versus opportunistic case finding for COPD. This will inform national policy on the most efficient approach to identifying clinically relevant cases, who can benefit from evidence based management.WP2 is the inception of the COPD cohort with 3-yr follow-up to investigate prognosis. New cases identified through WP1 will be invited to participate. In addition, all adults with documented COPD diagnosis from practices will be invited, with the aim of recruiting 2000 in total. Baseline measures will be undertaken with 6-monthly follow up for at least 3 years. A better understanding of factors that determine prognosis, particularly those that are modifiable, is essential for informing patient management decisions, and facilitating doctor patient relationships. Thus a number of prognostic indices have been developed, based on people with more advanced COPD. We will use the data collected for the cohort to examine the validity of these indices in a primary care COPD population and modify or develop a more appropriate index. This will benefit patient management in primary care, where the majority of COPD patients are cared for. The well characterised cohort will also form a platform for other health service related research within this programme and in future.A significant proportion of those with COPD are of working age, but unemployment and absenteeism rates are higher than in the general population. WP3 will use data from the cohort to examine the relationship between COPD severity and employment, occupational performance and productivity. This will inform management of COPD in workplaces, and who should be targeted for workplace interventions. A sample of patients with COPD with poorer work performance will take part in a feasibility study with an occupational health assessment and recommendations aimed at improving performance. This will inform whether such intervention has potential benefit and is feasible.Currently there are relatively few effective interventions for those with mild/moderate CODP. WP4 will focus on this group, conducting an exploratory trial to assess the feasibility and acceptability of increasing physcial activity. This will inform a future definitive trial to assess the effectiveness of the intervention in modifying disease. Research team & environmentOur multidisciplinary team consists of NHS and academic partners with subject and methodological expertise across a breadth o

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A Proactive Integrated apprOach to ideNtifying and trEating people with COPD and “trEatable traits” in primary caRe (PIONEER COPD)
Missed Opportunities for improving outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in underserved populations.
Investigating current practice of prescribing ‘rescue packs’ in COPD in primary care in England
Independent determinants of health related quality of life in people with COPD. An exploratory cross sectional postal questionnaire study in stable COPD patients to inform subsequent non-pharmacological interventions
Patient self-management in primary care patients with COPD - a randomised controlled trial

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.