REACH Randomised evaluation of rehabilitation after acute proximal humerus fracture; a multi-centre, non inferiority, randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a self-directed rehabilitation programme versus physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation ( usual care) for adults with proximal humerus fracture/ Randomised evaluation of rehabilitation after acute proximal humerus fracture
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryA broken upper arm at the shoulder forces most people over 50 into a months-long recovery that currently requires multiple physiotherapy appointments they often cannot easily attend. This matters because attending those appointments is a real burden—patients cannot drive, struggle with public transport after a fall, and those living alone lack support. The standard model of care assumes repeated supervised sessions are necessary, but no one has rigorously tested whether a single advice session with a workbook and videos works just as well. The REACH trial directly compares the two approaches in a multi-centre, non-inferiority randomised trial. If the self-directed programme proves non-inferior, the impact would be immediate and practical. Patients could recover at home without the logistical and financial strain of repeated clinic visits. The NHS would free up physiotherapist time and reduce healthcare resource use, while patients—especially older adults with limited mobility or social support—would not be disadvantaged in their recovery. Shoulder function and quality of life at six months will determine whether the simpler option becomes the new standard of care.
View original technical description
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Musculoskeletal, Surgery, Inflammation and RecoveryPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know