Active Infection & Immunity NIHR-supported project
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adults with Chronic and/or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus who are Refractory and/or Intolerant to Antimalarial Therapy (D346BC00001)
About this grant
This summary is based on the grant title only — the full abstract was not available.
No substantive source abstract was published for this research project funded by NIHR.
Researchers
Michael Ehrenstein (Principal Investigator)
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adults with Chronic and/or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus who are Refractory and/or Intolerant to Antimalarial Therapy
Lavender - A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Anifrolumab in Adults with Chronic and/or Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus who are Refractory and/or Intolerant to Antimalarial Therapy
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo controlled Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of IV Anifrolumab in Pediatric Participants 5 to <18 Years of Age with Moderate to Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus While on Background Standard of Care Therapy
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Extension Study to Characterise the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Anifrolumab in Adult Subjects with Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Anifrolumab in Adult Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Original classification
Infection, Immunopathology & ImmunotherapeuticsPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know