Emergency Care After Self-Harm: Patient and Public Contributors' Experience of Evidence Synthesis
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryPeople who have harmed themselves often face emergency care that can either help or harm their recovery, yet researchers rarely ask these patients what they actually experienced from first responders. This matters because evidence reviews on emergency care after self-harm typically focus on clinical outcomes—waiting times, treatments, readmission rates—while ignoring how patients themselves felt about the care they received. Without that perspective, guidelines and training for paramedics, A&E staff, and crisis teams may miss what matters most to the people they are trying to help. The research team at York is now running a small “add-on” study alongside their main evidence review. They will interview six to eight patient and public contributors—including a young adult with lived experience—who are helping shape the review’s questions and outputs. Through short audio-recorded interviews and written reflections, the team will capture what these contributors found valuable, what barriers they faced, and how the process could improve. If this succeeds, it will show funders and researchers a practical method for genuinely incorporating patient voices into evidence synthesis—not as a tick-box exercise, but as a way to make research more relevant and impactful for the people who use emergency services after self-harm.
View original technical description
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Mental and Physical MultimorbidityPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know