Completed Education & Skills Society, Politics & Law

The Political Economy of Education Research (PEER) Network

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

In conflict-affected countries, schools can become battlegrounds where biased curricula or unequal access to education fuels the very grievances that sustain violence. At least 27 million children in 24 countries are out of school because of conflict, and these children are twice as likely to die before age five. Education can protect children and help rebuild societies, but it is often sidelined or politicised—sometimes making conflict worse rather than better. Current political economy analysis relies on international consultants producing one-off assessments that miss local history, language, and power dynamics. The PEER Network, a three-year initiative led by four universities, aims to fix this. It will establish two regional hubs in Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, bring together 40 policymakers and academics, and commission at least 20 locally owned research studies worth £800,000. If successful, the network will shift how international agencies and governments plan education in fragile states. Instead of top-down, culturally blind assessments, local experts will drive analysis and decision-making. The tools and resources will be freely available online, helping a new generation of researchers and practitioners design education systems that reduce inequality rather than entrench it.

View original technical description
Almost half of all children who are out of school live in conflict affected countries (at least 27 million children in 24 countries). Children in these countries are twice as likely to die before their fifth birthday and countries with conflict have some of the lowest literacy levels in the world and the largest inequalities between girls and boys, rich and poor. Good quality education can protect children in the midst of violence and provide life-saving messages concerning health and safety, as well as the knowledge, skills and attitudes to survive, recover and rebuild their society after conflict. Yet, education is often given a low priority in situations of conflict. We know that modern conflicts can last more than 20 years and often involve multiple armed groups competing for control of government institutions [such as schools], natural resources and territory. This also means that provision of education can be highly politicised in situations of conflict and this can prevent much needed assistance reaching those who need it most - it is usually the poorest or most marginalised who suffer the worst consequences of violent conflict. Education is usually considered 'a good thing', but we know that in certain circumstances education may actually be 'part of the problem' as well as 'part of the solution'. For example, unequal access to education and distribution of education resources may fuel grievances between groups in society, particularly if they are already in conflict. Exclusion of minority voices from decision-making will cause resentment. Insensitive or politically biased education policies in terms of the language of instruction or content of the curriculum may create mistrust between different ethnic, religious or cultural groups by fuelling stereotypes, xenophobia and other antagonisms. We therefore need to better understand the underlying political, economic and social reasons why education may sometimes aggravate conflict. This is known as Political Economy Analysis (PEA) and is highly relevant to the provision of education in conflict affected countries. However, there are problems with current approaches. There is a reliance on international consultants to undertake 'one-off' assessments that lack sensitivity to local history, politics, culture and knowledge of power-relations that are better conveyed in local languages. There is also a tendency to ignore the impact that international agencies have on national policies and practices, and the different political circumstances that operate in different parts of a country. There is often a reluctance to raise critical questions about education provision because they are too sensitive or may challenge vested interests. These severely limit the potential of analysis to improve the planning and development of socially just education systems. The PEER Network is a three-year initiative led by four universities (Ulster, Cape Town, Nazarbayev and Sussex) aimed at improving the quality of PEA in partnership with academics, policymakers and practitioners in conflict affected countries. By the end of the project we aim to have made an impact by: - Establishing two regional hubs of PEA expertise across conflict affected countries in Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa - Bringing together 40 policymakers, practitioners and academics to develop PEA tools, knowledge and expertise - Commissioning at least 20 research studies worth £800,000 to create locally owned knowledge bases - Making all the tools and resources freely available online to students, researchers and practitioners - Supporting a new generation to undertake political economy analysis of education systems in their own contexts - Influencing change in global practice in PEA for the benefit of children and young people in conflict affected countries

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Alan Smith (Principal Investigator)Azeem Badroodien (Co-Investigator)Helene Thibault (Co-Investigator)Karl O'Connor (Co-Investigator)Kelsey Shanks (Principal Investigator)Mario Novelli (Co-Investigator)Naureen Durrani (Co-Investigator)Yunus Omar (Co-Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

GCRF Development Award: The Political Economy of Education Research (PEER) Network
Decolonising Peace Education In Africa
Critically understanding education for peace and trust: a global network to overcome injustices
Safe, Inclusive Participative Pedagogy: Improving Early Childhood Education in Fragile Contexts
JustEd: Education as and for Environmental, Epistemic and Transitional justice to enable Sustainable Development

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.