Active Genetics & Molecular Biology Psychology & Behaviour

The Consequences of Encephalization: Testing Trade-offs in Cranial Evolution

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A bigger brain forces the rest of the head to adapt—and this project will map those evolutionary trade-offs across hundreds of bird and mammal species. For decades, biologists have studied why brains grow larger, but they have largely ignored the costs. A bigger brain needs a stronger skull to protect it, may squeeze the eyes or jaw muscles, and demands more energy. This project addresses that gap by asking what happens to the skull, eye, and cranial muscles when brain size increases, and how those structures in turn constrain further brain evolution. The researchers will use 3D imaging to quantify the skulls of hundreds of modern and fossil birds and mammals, then develop new causal modelling methods to distinguish correlation from cause-and-effect. This is fundamental science—it will not produce a medical treatment or a new material. But understanding how complex traits evolve together could eventually inform fields from palaeontology to robotics, where engineers designing compact, multi-function heads for machines face similar trade-offs. Previous fundamental work on cranial evolution has already reshaped our understanding of how birds, mammals, and hominids came to dominate their environments.

View original technical description
Evolutionary changes in brain anatomy underlie some of the most significant evolutionary transitions, including the origins of birds, placental mammals, and hominids. Enlarged, globular forebrains are thought to have facilitated the evolutionary success of these groups by enabling new cognitive, sensory, and behavioural repertoires, thereby unlocking new ecological niches. For this reason, understanding the timing, rate, and cause of evolutionary changes in brain shape and size in birds and mammals has been a major focus in evolutionary biology for decades. But brain expansion comes at a cost: not only is the brain metabolically expensive, but the rest of the head must also physically accommodate and protect the large brain. When brain size increases, what are the evolutionary consequences for the structure and function of other closely associated anatomical systems such as the skull, eye, and cranial muscles? Conversely, what influence do these structures exert on the brain's anatomy and evolvability? The aim of this project is to quantify how the morphological diversity and macroevolutionary dynamics of cranial structures have been influenced by the tradeoffs among these structures. To achieve this goal, we will go beyond simply quantifying correlations between traits and instead analyse the cause-and-effect interactions between traits by developing new evolutionary causal modelling methods. We will examine the evolution of the head as an integrated whole, quantifying the cranial anatomy of hundreds of modern and fossil birds and mammals using advanced 3D imaging and morphometric methods pioneered in my lab. By interrogating the trade-offs among cranial structures across scales of evolution, from macroevolutionary to microevolutionary, and developing new phylogenetic comparative methods, we will provide new evidence and tools for understanding how the interactions among complex traits affect the evolution of diversity through time.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Ryan Felice (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

An investigation of tetrapod skull architecture using advanced computer modelling techniques
An investigation of tetrapod skull architecture using advanced computer modelling techniques.
Morphological clocks: Quantifying module- and lineage-specific variation in rates of morphological evolution in the primate skull
Reconstructing skull evolution of fossil crown birds
The morpho-functional evolution of bird beaks and skulls

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.