Active Society, Politics & Law Psychology & Behaviour

BREAKtheBIAS: For Equal Access to Human Rights Justice

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A person's gender, ethnicity, or nationality can determine whether their human rights case ever gets heard—and this project will map exactly how that bias works. The international human rights system promises equal justice, but in practice, some victims succeed in bringing claims while others are systematically blocked. Researchers will analyse case law and conduct interviews to identify where and why these disparities occur, drawing on insights from social psychology and behavioural economics to build a new framework for detecting implicit, geographical, and structural legal bias. If successful, the project could help international courts and tribunals redesign their processes—from how cases are accepted to how lawyers are trained—so that access to justice no longer depends on who a victim is. This is fundamental research into the machinery of international law itself, with the potential to reshape how human rights bodies operate and whom they ultimately serve.

View original technical description
This project seeks to address one of the most challenging problems in the international human rights system - that of unequal access to human rights justice. It looks at the outcomes of 100,000 international, regional, and domestic human rights cases and identifies who is able to turn to human rights bodies and which individuals and groups are unsuccessful in making their claims. By identifying barriers that restrict access and examining the role of international lawyers in the process, the project makes a significant advance in the study of inequities in international law. It builds on insights from social psychologists and behavioural economists to introduce a pioneering new framework through which the existence and operation of bias against human rights victims can be analysed systematically. By looking at implicit, geographical, and structural legal bias, the project aims to understand the cause of access disparities so that legal processes and existing structures can be redesigned to ensure equal access to human rights justice for everyone. The project adopts a highly original mixed-methods approach. It builds on a large dataset of the case law of fifteen human rights bodies and more than 300 interviews in ten jurisdictions to quantitatively and qualitatively analyse how victims' characteristics influence the success of their human rights claims. For the first time in human rights, it marries in-person experiments with computer simulation to understand the dynamics of access to justice and to discover how new international rules and other bias-mitigating interventions could be used to break the bias. The findings of the project will make an important contribution to several academic fields, shining a new light on how we understand and study access to justice, whilst the solutions proposed can importantly help international courts and tribunals impart equal justice for all.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Veronika Fikfak (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A nudge in the rights direction? Redesigning the architecture of human rights remedies
BIAS: Responsible AI for Labour Market Equality
BIG IDEAs: Using Randomised Controlled Trials to Reduce Bias in the Workplace
Victims' access to justice through English criminal courts, 1675 to the present
Qualifying algorithmic secrecy

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.