A 33-month follow-up of 4,138 Kenyan schoolgirls will track whether cash payments, menstrual cups, or both, given during a previous trial, continue to shape their health and earnings as they become adults. The problem is that no one knows if school-based interventions for adolescent girls produce lasting benefits. Cross-sectional World Bank data suggest each extra year of secondary school cuts child marriage by 7.5% and teen pregnancy by 6.5%, and boosts adult earnings fivefold. But longitudinal studies are scarce, and results conflict: a Malawi cash-transfer trial found no HIV reduction two years after the intervention ended, while a Kenyan study suggested fertility suppression was permanent. This project fills that gap by re-surveying the original trial participants. If the interventions prove durable, the findings could reshape how governments and aid agencies invest in girls’ education. Policymakers would have hard evidence on whether cash transfers or menstrual products yield medium-term returns in HIV rates, fertility, maternal health, and income. The study also measures cost-benefits, so funders can decide which interventions deliver the most health and economic value per pound spent.
View original technical description
The World Bank has used cross-sectional studies to evaluate the benefits of maintaining schooling on adolescent girls and young women's (AGYW) sexual and reproductive health and productivity. These suggest that most gains are due to supporting AGYW to complete secondary education, with each additional year of secondary education estimated to reduce child marriage and teen pregnancy by 7.5%, and 6.5%, respectively. They also noted that AGYW completing secondary school earn up to 5-fold more, have a one-third reduction in total fertility, increased contraception use by a third, and a ~25% reduction in child stunting compared with AGYW with no education. However, few longitudinal studies have validated these effects, or examined effects of school interventions as AGYW reach adulthood. One study in Malawi, which gave cash to schoolgirls demonstrated an immediate effect of the intervention on reducing HIV and the herpes simplex virus (HSV-2), but detected no gains compared with controls 2 years after the intervention ended. A Kenyan study providing cash and HIV education in primary school followed AGYW to beyond school completion and found fertility rates did not catch up to rates in AGYW not receiving interventions, suggesting fertility was not 'bottled-up' during intervention and then released. These conflicting findings require validation with other studies. Our UK funded trial among 4138 Kenyan secondary schoolgirls, providing cash, a menstrual cup, or both, examined if interventions reduce school dropout, HIV, HSV-2, and sexual and reproductive harms compared with AGYW not provided interventions. As this trial finishes, we now aim to follow-up all participants to evaluate the medium-term impact of prior school interventions on AGYW's health and social equity as they transition to adulthood, and to measure the medium-term cost benefits from the prior trial interventions. The study will follow-up AGYW over 33 months, with two separate surveys with additional data captured through antenatal clinic (ANC) and hospital record reviews. We will use a socio-behavioural survey questionnaire, and HIV/HSV-2 testing, through house-to-house interviews. Every effort will be made to locate girls who have migrated to maximise representativeness across prior trial arms. Health and employment outcomes generated will be used to examine the return on investment and other cost-benefits. We will also conduct qualitative research to provide data to contextualise outcomes. Critical outcomes of interest will focus on: (1) Health - HIV/HSV-2 status, fertility; maternal and neonatal outcomes; sexual and reproductive health and risk behaviours, risk of intimate-partner violence; ability to access and use health facilities; infant, child and maternal mortality. Effects of COVID-19 on these outcomes will also be assessed. (2) Financial and social equity - girls type of employment, and income achieved. We will engage with communities for feedback on their perceptions of the trial, its' value in supporting girls' health, wellbeing, and schooling, and whether outcomes measured align with their perceived needs. We will continue to work with our Ministry of Health partners, expanding to other community-based partners who will support the study design, methods used, interpretation of findings, and inputting of findings into policy and programme guidelines. The research will be disseminated widely through research and social media platforms. The study will support capacity building, through one to one mentoring, workshops to develop new skills, and by utilising data generated for post-graduate studies and co-authored publications.
Anna Maria Van Eijk (Co-Investigator)Daniel Kwaro (Co-Investigator)David Obor (Co-Investigator)Duolao Wang (Co-Investigator)Elizabeth Nyothach (Co-Investigator)Eve Worrall (Co-Investigator)Garazi Zulaika (Co-Investigator)Linda Mason (Co-Investigator)Penelope Anne Phillips-Howard (Principal Investigator)Phillip Spinhoven (Co-Investigator)Tao Chen (Co-Investigator)
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know