Completed Society, Politics & Law Public Health & Healthcare

Decentralized autonomous organizations: A Community-Driven digital governance system on the blockchain

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Over 80,000 online communities now govern themselves using blockchain-based voting systems, collectively managing $60 billion in assets. These Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) let anyone join, propose ideas, and vote on decisions through automated smart contracts—removing traditional hierarchies of boards, executives, and supervisors. This matters because blockchain-based governance is spreading rapidly, yet researchers have barely studied how well it works. The project will synthesise knowledge from finance, economics, political science, law, and computer science to analyse DAO governance models—their risks, benefits, and effectiveness at maximising community welfare. Unlike traditional paper-ballot voting, blockchain governance is digital, automated, and cost-effective, making frequent elections feasible. But questions remain about when and why these systems succeed or fail, how votes get influenced, and how accountability works when things go wrong. The research is a knowledge synthesis report, not an experimental study. It will compile publicly recorded voting data from blockchains to reveal patterns in voter behaviour and causal relationships that have been difficult to explore before. For regulators and cryptocurrency stakeholders trying to understand this fast-growing form of governance, the report will provide the first comprehensive map of what works, what doesn't, and why.

View original technical description
In recent years, we have seen a surge in so-called Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). These are online communities that have come together to pursue a specific goal. Some are research- and media-oriented, discussing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) like waste management or financial literacy, voting on solutions, identifying research priorities, and publishing articles to inform the public. Other DAOs take a more active role by planning and organising initiatives that, for instance, aim to make cities greener, more digital, and more democratic. Some well-known examples are GreenDAO, OceanDAO, and SoCity DAO—communities that promote urban development by incentivising pro-social behaviour. A defining characteristic of DAOs is their use of blockchain-based governance systems, meaning that these communities lack formal divisions between governance, executive, and supervisory bodies. Instead, members participate in decision-making by voting on proposals online. Anyone can join a DAO, and all governance processes (such as voting polls, vote counting, and voting rules) are managed through smart contracts (computer programs stored and executed on the blockchain) to ensure fairness and transparency. When a proposal gains majority support, it is executed and implemented; if it does not, it is rejected. As of 2025, there are over 80,000 DAOs, with a market valuation of $60 billion. In this project, we will examine various governance models of DAOs, exploring their risks, benefits, and overall effectiveness in maximising community welfare. Many blockchain-based governance models resemble direct democracies. For instance, in Switzerland, citizens vote directly on policies covering social and environmental issues, infrastructure, finance, and education. Similarly, blockchain-based governance allows people to vote directly on community projects, funding decisions, or governance processes. Unlike traditional voting, which relies on paper ballots and manual counting, blockchain-based governance is digital, automated, inclusive, and cost-effective. These advantages make it easier to conduct frequent elections and polls, which is driving the increasing adoption of blockchain technology in governance. Blockchain-based governance has attracted interest from cryptocurrency stakeholders and global regulators alike, who are seeking to understand when and why decentralised governance systems succeed or fail, how they are influenced, and how accountability is managed in cases of misuse or failure. Since its inception in 2009, blockchain technology has grown into one of the largest financial settlement systems, used for trading, lending, and borrowing cryptocurrencies. With the rise of DAOs, cryptocurrencies are now used not only for trading but also as a voting mechanism for DAO proposals. In our report, we will bring together knowledge from areas such as finance, economics, political science, law, and computer science to analyse the pros and cons of this novel governance mechanism. Blockchain governance also offers insights into voting behaviour, as votes are recorded on the blockchain and are publicly accessible. We will synthesise insights into voter behaviour, influencing factors, and causal relationships that have previously been difficult to explore. We are confident that our knowledge synthesis report will provide valuable insights into this new and fast-growing form of governance, which has been under-explored in the literature.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Valerie Laturnus (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Can the blockchain fix digital copyright and will regulation be required?
Blockchain incentives: consensus and fairness
Regulating healthcare through blockchain: Mapping the legal, ethical, technical and governance challenges
Trusted and Transparent Voting Systems
Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies: Beyond the Code Console

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.