Active Society, Politics & Law Education & Skills

The Power of Bargaining: Elections, Rents and War-to-Peace Transitions in Afghanistan (2001-2021)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Afghanistan's post-2001 elections were meant to swap bullets for ballots, but each presidential vote instead provoked new disputes and shifting alliances, culminating in the 2021 collapse of the political order built after the international intervention. This fellowship asks why those polls failed to deliver the stability donors expected, drawing on more than fifty confidential interviews with Afghan presidential candidates and power-brokers. The research addresses a critical gap in understanding elections in war-torn societies. Rather than one-off gateways to democracy, elections function as recurring bargaining rounds where powerful actors renegotiate access to state resources. The relative bargaining power of each camp—shaped by pre-election coalition deals and external endorsements—determines whether a vote ends in swift concession or destabilising violence. If this succeeds, it will give policymakers concrete guidance on how pre-election elite coalitions and external signals condition the risk of conflict. The project will produce a book, a policy brief for the Foreign Office and UN agencies, and five short video explainers in Dari and Pashto so Afghans can access and debate the findings in their own languages. The work sharpens debates on democratic resilience and state fragility, offering donors a cautionary framework for future peace-support missions.

View original technical description
Afghanistan's post-2001 elections were meant to swap bullets for ballots. Yet each presidential vote provoked new disputes, shifting politico-military alliances and, in 2021, the collapse of the political order built after the international intervention. This fellowship asks why those polls failed to deliver the stability and legitimacy donors expected and shows, through this cautionary case, what external interventions should not do. My doctoral research is grounded in more than fifty confidential interviews with Afghan presidential candidates, opposition figures and other key power-brokers. Their accounts point to a clear pattern: in war-torn and divided societies, elections are not one-off gateways to democracy but recurring bargaining rounds in which powerful actors renegotiate access to state resources and government positions. The relative bargaining power of each electoral camp—set during pre-election coalition formation and endorsement deals—largely shapes what happens on election day and afterwards. When an incumbent and external sponsors make their backing crystal clear, rival elites accept side-payments and step back; when that backing is ambiguous, violence—or the threat of it—is used to secure a better deal. Grasping this sequence is essential if future peace-support missions are to avoid Afghanistan's fate. During the twelve-month fellowship, I will translate these findings into outputs that serve scholars, policymakers and the Afghan public. First, I will write a book, The Power of Bargaining: Elections, Rents and War-to-Peace Transitions in Afghanistan, and publish a peer-reviewed article comparing elections in the midst of war. Second, I will prepare a concise policy brief and host a practitioner workshop for officials in the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, relevant UN agencies and democracy-assistance NGOs, distilling how the configuration of pre-election elite coalitions—and the external signals that inflate or shrink their holding-power gap—rather than election-day logistics or anti-fraud technology, determines whether a vote ends in swift concession or in months of destabilising dispute. Third, I will script and release five short video explainers in Dari (Afghan Persian) and Pashto so that Afghans inside and outside the country can access—and debate—the research in their own languages. The fellowship is hosted by Durham University's Global Security Institute under the mentorship of Professor Roger Mac Ginty, a leading scholar-practitioner in peacebuilding whose networks link research to decision-makers. Durham's advanced training programme will deepen my skills in causal inference and in translating research for policy professionals, whilst a light teaching load (no more than six hours per week) will strengthen my publication record and classroom experience. By reframing elections as iterative power bargains rather than democratic finish lines, the project sharpens debates on democratic resilience, state fragility and external intervention. It offers donors concrete guidance on how pre-election coalition deals and external endorsements condition the risk of violence, whilst giving Afghans—journalists, students and activists—the tools to scrutinise future political openings more effectively.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Kaweh Kerami (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Peace Processes in Civil Wars
Power Politics and International Order in a Global Age
Mythmaking, Mega-Events, and Coercion: Autocratic Legitimation in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan
The Taliban's War: The Other Side of the Afghan Conflict, 2001-2015
Medicalised maternities, markets and moralities in Bangladesh: Building academic foundations and transforming debates

Original classification

Fellowship

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.