Active Plants, Animals & Ecology Food & Agriculture

Multigenerational impacts of insecticides on behaviour, life history and fitness in a wild insect

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A wild cricket’s ability to flee a predator or woo a mate may be quietly sabotaged by pesticides, even at doses that don’t kill it. Most pesticide testing happens in laboratories, where insects face no predators, no weather, and no competition. This misses how real-world pressures—like being eaten or regulating body temperature—interact with chemical exposure. The project uses a field system called “WildCrickets” to track pesticide effects across multiple generations in natural conditions. It focuses on three overlooked areas: predator avoidance, mating behaviour, and temperature control. If the research succeeds, it could reshape how regulators assess pesticide risks. European authorities already consider current methods outdated. By identifying which sublethal effects actually harm wild populations—and whether those harms carry into offspring—the findings could feed directly into updated environmental risk frameworks. The work is fundamental evolutionary ecology, not applied product testing. But similar fundamental studies have previously revealed hidden ecological tipping points that later informed policy on neonicotinoids and other chemicals. Deeper understanding of how pesticides ripple through wild insect behaviour and reproduction could ultimately help design agricultural practices that protect pollinators and natural pest controllers without relying on lab-only safety data.

View original technical description
Insects are the most diverse group of animals on Earth, and play vital roles in maintaining ecosystems. As pollinators, nutrient recyclers, natural pest controllers, and ecosystem engineers, they are essential to the health of the environment. However, recent reports highlight significant declines in insect populations, threatening the essential services they provide. The reasons behind these declines are complex, but effects of agricultural pesticides on non-target species have been identified as a potentially major contributor. Research shows that pesticides have sublethal effects on various traits in insects, such as foraging, movement, learning, and lifespan. In response to these findings, the European Union has banned several pesticides. However, our understanding of how these chemicals and their successors affect non-target insects in their natural environments is still limited. Most of what we know comes from lab-based studies, where controlled conditions provide enormous power to detect effects, but fail to capture how insects interact with their environment. This lack of real-world context is a concern because many critical factors, like the presence of predators or changing environmental conditions, aren't accounted for. To address this deficit, we aim to study the effects of pesticide exposure in nature using a unique experimental field system: "WildCrickets". By studying insects in their natural habitat, we can observe how pesticides impact individual fitness through longevity and reproductive success, as well as the traits that contribute to fitness including behavioural and life-history traits. Furthermore, by following successive generations, we can determine whether pesticides only affect exposed individuals or whether impacts can be passed on to offspring. A key focus of our project is how pesticides affect predator avoidance. In labs, predators are absent, but in the wild, being eaten is a major risk factor for most insects. Pesticides may impair insects’ ability to evade predators, which could have a significant effect on their fitness. Similarly, mating behaviours may be disrupted by chemicals affecting reproduction. Another area of focus is how pesticides affect the ability of insects to control their body temperature. For crickets and many other temperate insects, this is particularly important, as they rely on moving between sun and shade to optimise their body temperature. In addition to understanding immediate sublethal effects in their environmental context, another key question is the long-term impact of pesticide exposure on population evolution. For example, if pesticides affect traits related to sexual selection, such as a male’s ability to compete for mates, this may impact the rate at which a population can adapt to changes in its environment. Our research has both ecological and practical implications. By studying the effects of pesticides in the wild, we will address key knowledge gaps and contribute to more accurate environmental risk assessments for pesticides. European authorities have already acknowledged that current pesticide risk assessment methods are outdated. Our findings will help improve these frameworks by identifying where key risks lie. Ultimately, our goal is to use fundamental research in evolutionary ecology to support the development of more sustainable agricultural practices that minimize harm to insect populations.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Chris Bass (Co-Investigator)Tom Tregenza (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Exploring Mayflies and Bats: Assessing the Risk to Chemicals (EMBARC)
Integrating ecology and genetics for insect pest control
Selection on behaviour and life histories across generations in a natural population
Multiple stressor effects in biological pest control; improving efficacy in challenging environments
Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population

Original classification

Unknown

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.