Human cells use a set of protein detectors to spot DNA that has ended up in the wrong place—inside the cytoplasm instead of the nucleus or mitochondria—triggering inflammation and antiviral defences. But it is not clear how these detectors, including cGAS, DNA-PK, and IFI16, decide which response to launch depending on whether the DNA comes from a virus, a damaged organelle, or a genetic mutation. This project will map the molecular structures of these detector complexes and test how they behave when confronted with different DNA shapes, in human cells and during actual virus infections. It will also examine how mutations in the DNA-PK gene—linked to the autoimmune disease lupus (SLE)—alter these sensing responses. The work is fundamental science. It will not produce a drug or diagnostic test tomorrow. But understanding how the same DNA-sensing machinery can either protect against infection or drive autoinflammation could eventually guide the design of vaccine adjuvants, antiviral therapies, or treatments for lupus and related interferonopathies. Similar fundamental studies of immune sensors have previously unlocked new classes of drugs for cancer immunotherapy and rare inflammatory diseases.
View original technical description
Context and challenge The ability of human cells to sense and respond to nucleic acids is essential for antiviral immunity, but also underlies a broad range of diseases. DNA is a potent inflammatory trigger, ubiquitous inside nuclei and mitochondria, and present in pathogens such as DNA viruses and bacteria. Human cells can sense microbial DNA and self-DNA that has leaked from damaged organelles into the cytoplasm, causing an inflammatory response. Intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) bind foreign or mis-localised DNA and drive multiple signalling outputs required to restore tissue homeostasis. Dysregulation of these intracellular DNA sensing mechanisms therefore results in susceptibility either to infection or to autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Indeed, there is an extensive and growing list of inflammatory pathologies and interferonopathies where DNA sensing PRRs are implicated, including Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome (AGS), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren's syndrome and neurodegenerative diseases. The DNA sensing PRRs cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS), DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and interferon gamma inducible protein 16 (IFI16) all bind cytosolic DNA and are required for the initiation of antiviral immune responses. It is not clear, however, how these proteins biochemically and functionally interact in different contexts to ensure appropriate signalling following infection or tissue damage. Viral genomic DNA and damaged self-DNA from the nucleus or mitochondria activate these cytoplasmic DNA sensing PRRs, but how these different triggers result in the generation of different signals is not well defined. For example, DNA-PK is indispensable in antiviral responses to poxviruses while IFI16 is essential for sensing herpesvirus infections and nuclear DNA damage. Further, we have now shown that different DNA structures can differentially stabilise DNA PRR co-complexes. As such we hypothesise that DNA sensing is context specific so we will define the specific molecular complexes that determine cGAS/STING activation and signalling outputs in response to DNA virus infection and DNA damage. To fully explore this hypothesis requires an integrated structural, biochemical and cellular approach to define the nature of these protein complexes in vitro, in cells, and in the context of virus infection. Aims and Objectives Aim 1: Define the molecular structures of DNA PRR complexes and their interactions with different DNA substrates Aim 2: Determine the context-dependent mechanisms of intracellular DNA sensing in human cells Aim 3: Define how human disease-associated variants in DNA-PK modify intracellular DNA sensing responses Potential applications and benefits There are broad therapeutic applications for pharmaceutical modulation of DNA sensing PRRs either for enhancing antiviral immunity or reducing the excessive auto-inflammation they can cause. Activation enhances adaptive immune responses and so these PRRs are key targets for vaccine adjuvants and neoadjuvant cancer therapies. Understanding how different triggers are linked to different signalling outputs will help to understand the disparate clinical phenotypes caused by inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) in different components of DNA sensing pathways. Specifically, in this study, we will define the impact of novel SLE-associated mutations in DNA-PK. Therefore, we will make key fundamental advancements in antiviral immunity, in keeping with the UKRI’s strategic priority ‘Tackling Infections’, whilst identifying specific mechanisms underlying SLE.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know