Border police in Britain and France are using bone age tests and assessment boards to determine whether young migrants are children or adults—and this project will trace how that practice emerged over the past century. The problem is that age determination has become central to migration enforcement, yet the historical roots of these policies are rarely examined. Advocacy groups, medical ethicists, and social scientists have questioned the accuracy and impact of methods like bone scans, but without understanding how and why age-based border policing developed, current debates lack context. This project fills that gap by reviewing immigration laws from the end of the First World War to the present, then focusing on three case studies: policing young refugees after World War 2, family reunification during decolonisation, and age-disputed migrants in Manchester and Marseille today. If successful, the research could reshape how policymakers, humanitarian organisations, and legal practitioners understand age assessment. It may lead to more informed regulations, better support for young migrants navigating border systems, and practical guidance for those directly affected. The project is historical and anthropological—it will not produce a new diagnostic tool—but by revealing how current standards came to be taken for granted, it could help shift public and policy debates toward more evidence-based, humane approaches.
View original technical description
Through a legal review and contextualised case studies from 20th and 21st centuries Britain and France, DeterAge aims to offer the first history of border policing which focuses on how age has become increasingly important to migration processes and experiences. The use of chronological age to categorise populations is one of the key aspects of the modern state (Scott 1999). Its precise determination is essential to a wide array of fields including criminal responsibility and medicine (Schmeling and Black 2010) and has become central to Global North migration regimes. From the French Constitutional Court’s decision in 2019 to validate the use of bone age tests, to the launch of an Assessment Board by the British Home Office in 2023, it is now one of the most pressing issues in British and French public and policy debates around migration and asylum. Advocacy groups and practitioners, from human rights organisations to hospital ethics committees, as well as scholars in disciplines as diverse as social anthropology or radiology have frequently questioned the validity of assessment methods and their impacts on migrant well-being (Alshamrani 2019, Bialas 2023, Paté 2023). These discussions, whilst valuable, often lack a historical dimension that could help better understand the complex situations and processes that shape experiences and responses to displacement. DeterAge will examine why and how age-based border policing was produced by British and French policy makers, implemented by law enforcement and their intermediaries, and experienced by young migrants. Britain and France provide paradigmatic cases to examine how liberal democracies have used age in border policing. They were among the first countries in the world to create age measures that targeted migrants, implemented stricter age control during and after the independence of their colonies, and are now widely using age determination as part of migrant and refugee screening. Building on understandings of the border as an increasingly mobile framework (Shachar 2020), DeterAge will historicise the often-unquestioned age standards that continue to shape laws, humanitarian responses, and migration experiences. After reviewing how age has been included in the main immigration laws from the restrictions of the end of the First World War to the generalisation of biometrics and securitised environment today, this project will focus on three case studies: two historical case studies led by the PL on (i) policing young refugees in the aftermath of World War 2 and (ii) family reunification in the decolonisation era; and one anthropological case study led by the RIA on (iii) age-disputed young migrants and their support networks in Manchester and Marseille today. Bringing together a long-term legal review with three case studies will allow for an approach that encompasses wide-ranging spaces, techniques, and experiences of border policing during key periods of British and French modern migration history. Expanding ongoing collaborations with two key protection actors, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in France and the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU) in Britain, DeterAge will produce wide-ranging publications and outreach activities to inform current debates, including a monograph and three peer-reviewed journal articles, a practitioner-oriented workshop, a policy report, public events, and a guide for young migrants. Its results will be disseminated to a wide audience of scholars and stakeholders that engage with health and well-being in the context of migration and asylum, as well as young migrants themselves and their networks.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know