Active Heart, Stroke & Blood Brain & Nervous System

Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the Benchmark Risk Indication Tool for Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy and Severe systolic Heart failure (BRITISH)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Every year, thousands of people with a weakened heart muscle receive a powerful implanted defibrillator (ICD) that they may never need. Current guidelines recommend an ICD for anyone with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) falls to 35% or below—a blunt threshold that a major recent trial found provides no overall survival benefit for this group. The problem is that most patients get the device without ever needing its shock, while others who would benefit are missed. The BRITISH trial aims to replace this crude measure with a more precise one: a scar in the heart muscle, visible on a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) scan. Researchers will randomise 1,252 patients across 35 UK centres, using the presence of CMR-detected scar as the sole criterion for ICD implantation. A parallel registry will track what happens to patients without scar, who will not receive the device. If successful, this trial could rewrite international guidelines, sparing thousands of patients an unnecessary surgical implant while directing the device to those who truly need it. The result would be better-targeted care and significant cost savings for the NHS.

View original technical description
Sudden arrhythmic death is an important cause of death in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Current guidelines recommend prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator (ICD) if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is ≤35%. A recent substantial trial found no overall benefit from an ICD in this population. Selection criteria for an ICD in NICM are blunt; most patients receiving an ICD will never benefit from it. Strategies to improve stratification of NICM patients who would benefit from an ICD would have important clinical and economic impacts. The presence of CMR-identified scar indicates an increased risk of sudden death and these patients have potential to benefit from ICD therapy. The aim of BRITISH is to determine, in a randomised trial of 1252 patients at 35 UK centres, whether the presence of CMR-detected scar used as the arbiter of ICD therapy results in a lower all-cause mortality. A registry will allow observation of event rates in scar negative patients. Feasibility will be tested in a Vanguard phase, aiming to recruit 256 randomised patients over 12 months (following set up) with clear stop/go criteria. The results of this trial will inform international guidelines and have the potential to improve patient care and save money.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Andrew Flett (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the Benchmark Risk Indication Tool for Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Severe systolic Heart failure
Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the Benchmark Risk Indication Tool for Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Severe systolic Heart failure (BRITISH)
Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the Benchmark Risk Indication Tool for Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with Non-Ischemic Cardiovascular and Severe systolic Heart failure
Using Cardiovascular magnetic resonance identified scar as the Benchmark Risk Indicator Tool for Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and Severe systolic Heart failure - BRITISH Study
AI-Enhanced Risk Stratification for Implanted Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients

Original classification

Clinical Study

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.