Indonesia supplies a third of the world’s nickel and tin, but the mining that fuels clean energy also destroys ecosystems and exposes communities to pollution. This interdisciplinary network brings together political scientists, chemists, economists, and legal scholars to study the evolving mineral trade partnership between the EU and Indonesia. The problem is that deepening trade relationships have shifted emissions from richer to poorer countries, and Global South nations are increasingly resisting international decarbonisation efforts. Meanwhile, new mining developments often sit on land held by indigenous and land-dependent people, creating social justice tensions. The team will analyse how voters, civil society, and decision-makers weigh mining objectives against development and foreign policy goals. Chemists will help social scientists quantify the true costs of pollution, while legal scholars ensure laws reflect the latest scientific understanding of mining impacts. If successful, this research could produce enforceable mining regulations that balance climate adaptation with local livelihoods—a practical framework for how resource-rich nations and trading partners can negotiate sustainable extraction without sacrificing either ecosystems or economic growth.
View original technical description
This interdisciplinary network combines expertise from political scientists, chemists, economists, and international law scholars to offer more holistic solutions to complex mining governance issues. Our goal is to understand the opportunities and challenges of the evolving mineral resource partnership between the EU and Indonesia, and how this cooperation influences climate adaptation strategies in the mining sector. Clean energy transitions significantly increase demand for critical minerals, and Indonesia accounts for a third of global nickel and tin production. As deepening trading relationships have shifted a large share of emissions from richer to poorer countries, Global South nations are increasingly resisting international decarbonization efforts. While extractive industries like nickel mining generate jobs and growth, they also destroy ecosystems, expose residential communities to health risks, and exacerbate social justice problems as many new mineral developments are located on land held by indigenous and land-dependent people. We will analyse how voters, civil society actors, and decisionmakers weigh minerals trade objectives against development and foreign policy goals. Economists and political scientists will collaborate to understand which factors influence public opinion on mining, legal scholars will collaborate with chemists to ensure that laws reflect the latest scientific understanding of mining impacts, and chemists will help social scientists quantify the true costs of pollution. By combining perspectives, each discipline will fill in crucial information that might not emerge within siloed fields of study. It will help develop a common language for discussing mining governance and provide insights on how to design laws that are feasible and enforceable.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know