Every day, care home residents in Wales and England will swallow a capsule containing two strains of live bacteria—*Lactobacillus rhamnosus* LGG and *Bifidobacterium animalis* BB-12—to see if it cuts their total days on antibiotics over a year. Older adults in care homes are highly vulnerable to infections and frequently prescribed antibiotics, which drives antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This trial directly tests whether a simple, cheap probiotic can reduce antibiotic use, slow AMR, and improve vaccine responses—a practical gap in evidence that could change routine care. If the probiotic works, care homes could adopt a daily supplement to lower infection rates, reduce hospital stays, and preserve antibiotic effectiveness. The trial also examines whether the probiotic boosts flu vaccine efficacy and reduces gut colonisation by resistant bacteria like *C. difficile* and VRE. These are concrete, measurable outcomes that could reshape infection management in residential care without requiring new drugs or complex procedures.
View original technical description
AIMS: To evaluate the effect of a dose of daily oral probiotics on cumulative systemic antibiotic administration days (CAAD) for all-cause, acute infections. HYPOTHESIS (Primary): Daily oral probiotic reduces CAAD for infection vs placebo in Care Home Resident (CHR). HYPOTHESIS (Mechanisms): Daily oral probiotic reduces gastrointestinal colonisation with AMR bacteria, enhances influenza vaccine response and modulates ex-vivo cytokine and chemokine response to Toll Like Receptor (TLR) agonists vs placebo in CHR. DESIGN: Double blind, individually randomised, 2 arm efficacy, placebo controlled trial. DURATION: 12 months. POPULATION: Care home residents in Wales and England. Inclusion: Currently living in a care home setting (residential, nursing or mixed); Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial OR if the participant lacks capacity, a consultee is willing to complete a consultee declaration form; Aged 65 years or older. Exclusion: The CHR may not enter the trial if ANY of the following apply: Is known to be immunocompromised (requiring immunosuppressants, long term, high dose oral, intramuscular or intravenous steroids); Is currently taking regular probiotics and is not willing to adapt to trial protocol; Currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product (CTIMP), or has been a participant in a CTIMP in the last thirty days; Is a temporary care home resident (i.e. less than 1 month of planned transitional/respite residential care); Death is thought to be imminent; Lactose intolerant. INTERVENTIONS: Probiotics containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus, LGG (LGG) and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, BB-12 (BB-12) vs. placebo. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Primary: CAAD for all-cause infections over 12 months. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Infection: Total number of days of antibiotic administration for each infection type (respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal infection, unexplained fever and other); number, site, duration of infection; estimation of incidence and duration of diarrhoea and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea; Stool microbiology; C. difficile infection; Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae and vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE); LGG and BB-12; Oral Microbiology: Candida spp.; Health & Wellbeing: Self and/or proxy health-related quality of life EQ5D (5L); self-and/or proxy reported ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people; Hospitalisations: Number and duration of all-cause hospital stays; Mortality: Deaths; Mechanistic Immunology outcomes: Influenza vaccine efficacy (haemagglutination inhibition assay and antibody titres); full blood count and immune cell phenotypes, plasma cytokines and chemokines; cytokine and chemokine response in whole blood stimulated ex-vivo by toll-like receptor 2 and 4 agonists; monocyte and neutrophil phagocytosis of E.coli; serum Vitamin D. TERTIARY OUTCOME: Level of serum Vitamin D and AMR colonisation within stool sample. OTHER OUTCOME: Qualitative sub-study to understand how the trial was conducted within the care home context and identify the mechanisms which affect implementation of trial activities. ASSESSMENTS: Blood, saliva, stool samples collected at baseline, 3 month (no blood) and 12 month. Study nurses will attend regularly to record infections and antibiotic prescribing (MAR sheets). SAMPLE SIZE: Our previous study predicts 17.4 days on antibiotics/CHR/year. We aim to randomise between 258 and 270 participants. Assuming a mean number of days for which primary outcome data will be available (i.e. accounting for follow-up time and missing data) of approximately 250 days, this will provide at least 82% power to detect a 10% relative reduction in CAAD. RECRUITMENT: We will approach 660 residents from around 20 homes (assuming 50% CHR recruitment from homes with >50 eligible CHR). ANALYSIS: The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat, and will consist of a be
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know