Active Bones, Joints & Muscles NIHR-supported project Heart, Stroke & Blood

REACH Randomised evaluation of rehabilitation after acute proximal humerus fracture; a multi-centre, non inferiority, randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a self-directed rehabilitation programme versus physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation ( usual care) for adults with proximal humerus fracture/ Randomised evaluation of rehabilitation after acute proximal humerus fracture

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A broken upper arm at the shoulder forces most people over 50 into a months-long recovery that currently requires multiple physiotherapy appointments they often cannot easily attend. This matters because attending those appointments is a real burden—patients cannot drive, struggle with public transport after a fall, and those living alone lack support. The standard model of care assumes repeated supervised sessions are necessary, but no one has rigorously tested whether a single advice session with a workbook and videos works just as well. The REACH trial directly compares the two approaches in a multi-centre, non-inferiority randomised trial. If the self-directed programme proves non-inferior, the impact would be immediate and practical. Patients could recover at home without the logistical and financial strain of repeated clinic visits. The NHS would free up physiotherapist time and reduce healthcare resource use, while patients—especially older adults with limited mobility or social support—would not be disadvantaged in their recovery. Shoulder function and quality of life at six months will determine whether the simpler option becomes the new standard of care.

View original technical description
A break to the bone of the upper arm at the shoulder is a painful injury. It results in a sudden loss of use of the arm with recovery taking many months. Most injuries occur in people over 50 years of age after a fall, due to reduced bone strength, and are usually treated with a sling, although some fractures may need surgery. Currently, people are asked to see a physiotherapist a number of times to help with recovery after a proximal humerus fracture. Attending physiotherapy appointments can however be very difficult, especially for people who live alone or have poor social support networks. Driving is not possible and public transport is a struggle due to low confidence after a fall. A one-off advice session, with clear verbal and written instructions and videos of exercises patients can do at home, could be an alternative to attending physiotherapy clinic for multiple sessions. Providing high-quality advice so people can manage their own recovery could be less of a burden for patients and their carers who might use fewer healthcare resources. Before widely using an alternative advice approach, it is important to know that people receiving a one-off advice session would not be disadvantaged in their recovery compared with people having a series of physiotherapy appointments. The REACH trial aims to find out the best way to support recovery and will compare the recovery of patients who receive a single advice session with a health professional and access to a workbook and videos to use at home, with the recovery of patients who are referred to see a physiotherapist. After 6 months, patients’ shoulder function and quality of life will be compared between the two groups.

Researchers

Paul Matthews (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Randomised Evaluation of rehabilitation and Acute proximal Humerus fracture: a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a self-directed rehabilitation programme versus physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation (usual care) for adults with a proximal humerus fracture
Randomised Evaluation of rehabilitation after ACute proximal Humerus fracture (the REACH trial) NIHR153139
Randomised Evaluation of rehabilitation after ACute proximal Humerus fracture (the REACH trial)
A three-arm randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty versus non-surgical care for acute three and four- part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients over 65 years of age – Proximal Fracture Of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation trial No.2 (PROFHER-2).
Treatment and recovery after shoulder fracture

Original classification

Musculoskeletal, Surgery, Inflammation and Recovery

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.