Active Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs NIHR-supported project Bones, Joints & Muscles

SUSTENANCE: Development of a toolkit to improve post-operative feeding practices and nutritional intake in patients with head and Neck cancer undergoing surgery with flap tissue transfer reconstruction

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Every year, 12,400 people in the UK are diagnosed with head and neck cancer, and three-quarters of them undergo surgery that often requires flap reconstruction, leaving them dependent on a feeding tube for nutrition. The problem is that no one knows the right moment to remove that tube and restart oral eating. Nasal tubes are often pulled early because they delay hospital discharge, yet 40 to 72 percent of patients cannot meet their nutritional needs after surgery. This undermines wound healing, recovery, and survival. Current practice varies wildly, driven by hospital policies and individual swallowing ability rather than evidence. This study will build a toolkit for clinicians. Researchers will review existing evidence, survey UK healthcare professionals, analyse hospital data, and observe both staff practices and patient experiences. Patients who have had flap surgery report abrupt, confidence-shattering transitions to eating; they will help shape the study materials. If successful, the toolkit could standardise feeding practices across the NHS, ensuring tubes stay in long enough for patients to eat adequately but not so long that they delay discharge. The result would be better recovery, fewer complications, and less isolation for patients learning to eat again.

View original technical description
This study aims to improve nutrition for head and neck cancer patients transitioning from tube-feeding to eating after surgery. In the UK, 12,400 people are diagnosed with this cancer annually, with 75% undergoing surgery, often requiring reconstruction (‘flap’ surgery). Post-surgery, patients receive nutrition via a feeding tube, but the timing of restarting oral intake and tube removal varies due to swallowing ability, swelling, and hospital policies. Nasal tubes are often removed early, even before patients can eat enough, as they may delay discharge. Research shows 40–72% of patients struggle to meet nutritional needs post-surgery, impacting recovery, wound healing, survival, and well-being. This study will identify factors affecting resumption optimal oral intake to ensure feeding tubes are removed at the right time. We will review existing research, survey UK healthcare professionals, analyse hospital data, and observe staff practices and patient experiences. Findings will inform a staff toolkit to improve feeding practices. Patients who have undergone flap surgery shared that they lacked confidence when restarting eating, often facing abrupt transitions, which made them feel isolated. They will help shape this study by reviewing study materials. Results will be shared through social media, blogs, an animated video, charities, and professional meetings to enhance practice and patient support.

Researchers

Florence Cook (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

SUSTENANCE: Development of a toolkit to improve poSt-operative feeding practices and nUtritional intake in patientS wiTh hEad and Neck cANCer undergoing surgEry with flap tissue reconstruction
SUSTENANCE: Development of a toolkit to improve poSt-operative feeding practices and nUritional intake in patientS wiTh hEad and Neck cANCer undergoing surgEry with flap tissue reconstruction.
A study evaluating a newly designed nutritional tube feeding pouch for bolus feeding in adults
Prehabilitation of swallowing difficulties in people with head and neck cancer: A pilot cluster randomised trial and process evaluation
Resources for Living (R4L) Pilot: Exploring the Potential of Progressive Cuisine for Quality of Life Improvement for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

Original classification

Theme 3 Safer Innovation

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.