Active Cancer NIHR-supported project Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs

ZEBRA Zanubrutinib plus rituximab (Zanu-R) as fixed duration, early intervention versus observation for patients with indolent mantle cell lymphoma: a randomised phase II clinical trial

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A quarter of patients with mantle cell lymphoma have a slow-growing form of the disease that doctors currently leave untreated until it worsens—this trial tests whether giving them a targeted drug combination earlier could delay or prevent that progression. The standard “watchful waiting” approach for indolent MCL leaves patients with no treatment until their lymphoma becomes aggressive, at which point they receive chemotherapy plus rituximab. This trial asks whether starting treatment earlier with zanubrutinib (a daily capsule) plus rituximab (an infusion) could improve outcomes compared to waiting. It is a randomised phase II trial: half the patients receive the drug combination for six cycles, while the other half continue active observation. If earlier treatment proves beneficial, it could shift clinical practice for this patient group—offering a fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free option that might delay disease progression and reduce the need for more intensive therapy later. The trial runs at NHS hospitals and follows all patients for at least two years after enrolment. No immediate practical application is guaranteed; the results will determine whether a larger phase III trial is warranted.

View original technical description
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Most patients with MCL need to start treatment soon after diagnosis, usually with a combination of chemotherapy and a 'targeted' treatment called rituximab. 25-30% of patients have 'indolent' (non-aggressive) MCL where the standard approach is an initial period of 'watchful waiting' followed by treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy when the lymphoma worsens (progresses).In this trial we will investigate whether there is a benefit of giving earlier treatment with zanubrutinib and rituximab (Zanu-R) compared to patients not being treated (watchful waiting). This is a randomised trial, meaning half of the patients with receive Zanu-R, and half will undergo 'watchful waiting' without any treatment.Patients who receive trial treatment will take zanubrutinib capsules twice a day, every day for six 28-day cycles and rituximab given as an infusion into a vein on or around the first day of each cycle. Patients who do not receive trial treatment will continue active observation (watch and wait) until clinical progression. Upon clinical progression all patients will be treated as per standard of care.All patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years following being enrolled into the trial until the last patient entering the trial completes their 2 year follow up visit.The trial will be conducted at NHS hospitals and is expected to last 4 ½ years.

Researchers

Mark Bishton (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Zanubrutinib plus rituximab (Zanu-R) as fixed duration, early intervention versus observation for patients with indolent mantle cell lymphoma: a randomised phase II clinical trial
Phase 3, interventional, multicentre, open-label, randomized study comparing rituximab plus zanubrutinib to rituximab monotherapy in previously untreated, symptomatic splenic marginal zone lymphoma (RITZ)
A Phase 3 Randomized Double-Blind Multicenter Study of Sonrotoclax PlusZanubrutinib Versus Placebo Plus Zanubrutinib in Patients WithRelapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma
A randomized phase II trial evaluating Ibrutinib plus CD20 Ab and Ibrutinib-Venetoclax plus CD20 Ab in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma
A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) Plus Anti-CD20 Antibodies Versus Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.