Active Brain & Nervous System NIHR-supported project Cancer
Luce-1: A Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Open-label, Dose Escalation, Safety and Efficacy Study of Subretinal Administration of Dual AAV8.MYO7A, AAVB-081 in Subjects with Usher Syndrome Type 1B (USH1B) Retinitis Pigmentosa
About this grant
This summary is based on the grant title only — the full abstract was not available.
No substantive source abstract was published for this research project funded by NIHR.
Researchers
Michel Michaelides (Principal Investigator)
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
A Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Open-label, Dose Escalation, Safety and Efficacy Study of Subretinal Administration of Dual AAV8.MYO7A, AAVB-081 in Subjects with Usher Syndrome Type 1B (USH1B) Retinitis Pigmentosa
A Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Retinal Gene Therapy in Subjects with Choroideremia Previously Treated with Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Encoding Rab Escort Protein-1 (AAV2-REP1) and in Subjects with X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Previously Treated with Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Encoding RPGR (AAV8-RPGR) in an Antecedent Study
A Phase 2/3, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Dose-ranging, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Intravitreal JNJ-81201887 (AAVCAGsCD59) Compared to Sham Procedure for the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
A Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Retinal Gene Therapy in Subjects with Choroideremia Treated Previously with Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Encoding Rab Escort Protein-1 (AAV2-REP1) in an Antecedent Study
Long-term follow-up study of participants following an open label, multi-centre, Phase I/II dose escalation trial of an adeno-associated virus vector (AAV2/5-OPTIRPE65) for gene therapy of adults and children with retinal dystrophy due to RPE65 deficiency (LCA2)- OPTIRPE65 FU
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know