Active Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions Brain & Nervous System

Cooling in Mild Encephalopathy Trial (COMET)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Around 800 babies a year in the UK are born with mild brain injury from oxygen deprivation at birth, and doctors are increasingly cooling them to 33.5°C without knowing if it helps or harms. This trial tests whether whole-body hypothermia—already standard for moderate or severe cases—improves cognitive development at age two compared with keeping babies at normal body temperature. The problem is that cooling carries real risks: it can force babies onto ventilators, trigger bleeding disorders, and lengthen intensive care stays. Observational reports suggest it may cause more harm than good in mild cases. If the trial shows cooling is safe and effective, it will likely become national guidance, sparing hundreds of families the long-term educational and cognitive struggles these children often face. If cooling proves unsafe or no better than standard care, the NHS could reverse a costly therapeutic drift, saving money and avoiding unnecessary intensive care for newborns who do not need it. Either way, the results will settle a pressing clinical debate and directly shape how neonatal units across the UK treat mild encephalopathy.

View original technical description
Research question Does whole-body hypothermia to 33.5oC, initiated within 6h of birth and continued for 72h, improve cognitive development at two years of age after mild hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) compared with targeted normothermia at 36.50C? Background In the UK, around 800 babies (0.8 per 1000 livebirths) are admitted to neonatal units with mild HIE. These babies have lower cognitive scores at 2 years, and lower IQ during school age compared with healthy peers and 38% require special educational support. Whole-body hypothermia, an evidence-based intensive care therapy for babies with moderate or severe HIE, is increasingly used for babies with mild HIE in the NHS without an adequate evaluation of the safety and efficacy. Observational reports suggest that hypothermia increases several adverse outcomes in these babies including need for invasive ventilation, opioid use, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hepatic dysfunction, cardiac dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, metabolic acidosis and increases intensive care stay. Aims The goal of this randomised control trial is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of whole-body hypothermia as a therapy for babies with mild HIE. Methods: Multi-centre open label two-arm randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and masked outcome assessments recruiting babies born at or after 36 weeks from 60 NHS hospitals over a 2 ½ year period. Babies with evidence of intrapartum asphyxia AND mild encephalopathy on neurological examination AND normal amplitude integrated EEG between 1 and 6 hours will be recruited, following parental consent, and randomised to whole-body hypothermia (33.50C) or targeted normothermia (36.50C) within 6h of birth. The primary outcome is the mean Cognitive Scale Composite score from the Bayley-III examination at 24 (+2) months, performed by a central team of three examiners masked to the allocation. Short term outcomes and adverse events will include mortality, duration of intensive care and hospital stay, duration of ventilatory and inotropic support, bloodstream positive infection, thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy requiring blood products, seizures, cerebral and pulmonary bleeding, opioid use, and breastfeeding at hospital discharge. Decision-analytic modelling will be used to estimate long term cost-effectiveness across the whole life span. A sample size of 382 infants in total (191 in each group) was calculated to detect a clinically important minimum difference of 5 points (0.3 SD), at a 0.05 significance level and 90% power as the Bayley III Composite score has a mean of 100 and SD of 15. This increases to 426, after allowing for a conservative 10% drop-out rate. Timelines for delivery The total study duration will be 5·5 years (6-month set-up period; 2·5 years of recruitment; 2 years for neurodevelopmental outcome assessments; 6 months for data analysis and the preparation of reports) Anticipated impact and dissemination The COMET trial was developed in response to a call from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine for urgent evaluation of the safety and efficacy of hypothermia in mild HIE and is likely to be rapidly adopted into the national guidelines for implementation. On the other hand, if hypothermia is neither safe nor effective, therapeutic drift will be reversed leading to a cost saving of at least £5 million per annum as hypothermia increases intensive care stay by three days.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Cooling in Mild Encephalopathy (COMET) trial
Optimal duration of Cooling therapy in Mild Encephalopathy (COMET 1)
Caffeine for Neuroprotection in Birth-Related Brain Injury
Optimising newborn nutrition during therapeutic hypothermia: an observational study using routinely collected data
Developing better treatments for birth related brain injury

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.