Active Lungs & Breathing Diabetes, Hormones & Metabolism

Exacerbation Prevention in COPD-OSA overlap syndrome (EPiC-OSA)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A simple home sleep study could determine whether thousands of COPD patients need a breathing machine at night to prevent lung attacks. People with both COPD and obstructive sleep apnoea (the "overlap syndrome") suffer more frequent and severe exacerbations than those with COPD alone, yet no randomised trial has tested whether treating the sleep apnoea with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy reduces those attacks. This trial will screen 600 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD who have had at least one severe or two moderate exacerbations in the past year, randomising those with moderate-to-severe sleep apnoea to usual care plus PAP or usual care alone. The primary outcome is the number of moderate and severe exacerbations over the following year. If PAP proves effective, the intervention is already widely available and could be rapidly adopted into NHS practice, potentially reducing hospital admissions, healthcare costs, and the debilitating cycle of lung attacks that disrupt patients’ lives. An embedded health economic evaluation will determine whether the treatment is cost-effective for the UK health system.

View original technical description
Introduction: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are a major burden to the health system and cause significant morbidity for patients. Patients with COPD who also have obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), termed COPD-OSA overlap, have more exacerbations than patients with COPD alone. Observational data suggests treating OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy may reduce exacerbation frequency in these patients. There are no randomised clinical trials directly evaluating this, limiting evidence available for clinicians and patients to make decisions. Aim: We will assess the impact of PAP on exacerbation frequency in patients with overlap. We will incorporate health economic and process evaluations to allowing a robust assessment of the intervention and facilitating adoption into clinical practice. Method: We will use a multi-centre, open label, randomised clinical trial design. Patients with moderate to severe COPD and a high risk of exacerbations (1 severe or 2 moderate exacerbations in the past 12 months) will be screened for the presence of overlap syndrome using a simple home sleep study. Patients with moderate-severe OSA (AHI>15/h) will be randomised to usual care and PAP or usual care alone. The primary outcome will be frequency of moderate and severe exacerbations in the year after randomisation and will be evaluated on an intention to treat basis. Patients will have baseline clinical and demographic measurements completed with monthly telephone contacts to collect health care utilisation and review PAP usage (active treatment group). Face to face reviews will be conducted at 3 and 12 months to collect lung function. A pragmatic clinical definition of an exacerbation will be used. Defined by worsening respiratory symptoms in the absence of another pathology with an escalation of therapy including prescription of antibiotic, corticosteroids or both instituted by the clinical team. The severity of an exacerbation will be assessed as moderate (clinician managed in community) severe (hospital admission). UK data suggests an expected moderate-severe exacerbation rate of 2.8 (SD 2.5) exacerbations per patient per year. A minimal clinically important reduction in exacerbation rate of 25% (0.7 exacerbations/year) has been used in similar trials. A sample size of 600 (300 per group) is required based on a drop-out and lost to follow-up rate of 14%, sensitivity of 0.05 and power of 0.9. An economic evaluation, in line with NICE recommended methodology, will be completed using the collected health care utilisation and outcome data to evaluate the short-term cost effectiveness of PAP in the UK health system. The trial will run with an internal pilot with robust feasibility criteria based on proportion of screened patients included, number of patients randomised per site per month and dropout rate. A process evaluation will be completed concurrently to optimise trial design. Timeline: Initial regulatory approval and site setup will be established in 6 months. Pilot trial including evaluation will be completed in 14 months with decision to proceed to full trial an month 14. Recruitment will take a further 15 months followed by 1 year follow-up. 3 months has been allocated to complete analysis and write up. Total study duration 48 months. Impact: The study examines a medical device already in use and if shown to be clinically and cost effective could be rapidly adopted into UK practice.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Exacerbation Prevention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) overlap syndrome: The clinical and health economic impact of treating patients with COPD-OSA overlap syndrome and a high risk of future exacerbations with positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Can Mandibular Advancement Device Treatment For Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Reduce Nocturnal Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux: A Feasibility Study
MAD plus CPAP: does combining two established treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea give added benefits?
Randomised controlled trial of nasal decongestants versus placebo to prolong treatment free periods from continuous positive airway pressure therapy in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea
Zeus Sleep technology: A UK-based multi-centre randomised controlled trial using transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TESLA) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (TESLA MICRON UK)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.