Completed Psychology & Behaviour Public Health & Healthcare

Equitable access to cochlear implants: An application development award to underpin an evaluative trial of optimised hearing tests

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Cochlear implant candidacy currently relies on a speech test that penalises non-fluent English speakers and uses an artificial, loud voice in quiet that bears no relation to real-world listening. This 12-month development project will lay the groundwork for a future trial of optimised hearing tests that are fairer and more accurate. The problem is stark: adults with severe to profound hearing loss who do not speak fluent English are more likely to fail the existing test, making them ineligible for an implant that could improve their quality of life, mental health, and employability. The project has three workstreams: a systematic review of voice characteristics needed in better tests; patient and public involvement with 30 non-fluent English speakers from diverse ethnic backgrounds in Bradford, plus a group of fluent English speakers who have either received or been denied an implant; and stakeholder consultation with professional bodies, charities, clinics, and NHS leaders. If the subsequent trial succeeds, the NHS could adopt hearing tests that identify candidates more equitably and target surgical resources at those most likely to benefit in daily life.

View original technical description
Background: Compared to hearing aids, cochlear implants can improve quality of life, mental health, employability, and communication with family, friends, and health professionals for adults with severe to profound hearing loss, but coverage is low and inequitable. Many patients and audiologists dislike the speech-based hearing test used to determine candidacy because i) patients who do not speak fluent English are more likely to fail, meaning they are at greater risk of ineffective surgery and ii) it uses a deep, over-articulated, loud voice in quiet, not reflecting real life. Candidacy hearing tests need to be more acceptable, sensitive, specific, and identify candidates in an equitable way. Aim: Carry out underpinning development work to support an NIHR application to develop and trial optimised hearing test(s) for cochlear implant candidacy. Methods: Three independent, complementary workstreams: 1. Synthesise the evidence base for voice characteristics needed in optimised hearing tests via a systematic review, to inform the tests used in the subsequent project. Map the hearing tests used in the UK, analysing their acoustic properties (voice pitch, intonation, duration/speech rate, level, background noise) and characterise them in terms of objective speech-intelligibility metrics, language, and language-dependence, to identify any need to develop new tests in the subsequent project. 2. Patient and public involvement of diverse groups, using culturally appropriate, tailored deaf communication tactics, into subsequent study design. With bilingual Research Champions at the Race Equality Network in Bradford (a city of ethnic diversity and high deprivation) we will consult 30 adults with hearing loss who are not fluent in English and span a range of ethnicities. We will also form and consult with a group of fluent English speakers who either have an implant or were denied one due to their speech-based hearing test results. 3: Consult a network of stakeholders, using and expanding on our contacts in professional bodies, patient support groups, charities, clinics, research, and NHS leadership. We will consult via workshops, surveys, and online meetings on the research questions the subsequent study should address and how, to inform future National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance on adult implant candidacy. Synthesising results across workstreams will lead to a future project protocol underpinned by a solid evidence base, asking questions important to patients and clinicians in an acceptable way, and deliverable in the NHS. Timelines: The application development award work will be delivered in 12 months. The application for funding for the subsequent trial will be completed within 3 months of the development project conclusion. Anticipated impact and dissemination: Delivering within a team that has diverse specialist skills will develop the main applicant toward research independence. A strong bid for NIHR funding for hearing test development and a multi-site observational trial will be produced. This trial will reveal optimal cochlear implant candidacy hearing tests to rapidly translate into clinical practice, targeting healthcare funds more effectively at those most likely to gain real-life benefit. Results will be shared via NIHR platforms, conferences, peer-reviewed journals, magazines and accessible reports and video summaries to clinicians and members of the public via users groups, charities, and professional bodies.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Increasing hearing aid use in infants: contextualisation, development and feasibility testing of an equitable co-designed complex intervention: The RESONATE project.
Audimetroid, a tool for rapid delivery of hearing care and hearing aids
Personalized fitting and evaluation of hearing aids with EEG responses
Development and feasibility of a behavioural intervention to improve the beneficial use of hearing technology for adults with hearing loss
Feasibility of a RCT of the Active Communication Education (ACE) programme plus hearing-aid provision versus hearing-aid provision alone.

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.