Active Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions Heart, Stroke & Blood

Timing of Umbilical Cord Clamping for Preterm Infants Needing Resuscitation at Birth: The Opticord trial

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A very preterm baby needing resuscitation at birth will either have its umbilical cord left intact for at least three minutes or clamped and cut within the first minute, in a trial to see which approach saves more lives without causing severe brain injury. This matters because while delaying cord clamping helps preterm infants overall, doctors have been unsure whether it is safe for the sickest babies—those who need immediate breathing support. The question is the second highest priority for neonatal research in the UK, and no large trial has yet answered it for this specific group. If the intact-cord approach proves superior, it could change resuscitation protocols in delivery rooms worldwide, giving thousands of extremely premature infants a better chance of surviving without lifelong disability. If it does not, it would settle a long-standing clinical uncertainty and prevent unnecessary delays in emergency care. The results will be published in a high-impact journal and shared through the neonatal charity Bliss, directly influencing how doctors manage the most vulnerable newborns at the moment of birth.

View original technical description
RESEARCH QUESTION: In very preterm babies (born <32 weeks’ gestation) requiring neonatal resuscitation, is resuscitation with the umbilical cord intact for at least 3 minutes (‘intact’ group) superior to resuscitation with the umbilical cord clamped and cut during the first 60 seconds (‘clamped’ group) for survival without severe brain injury at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age. BACKGROUND, AIMS & OBJECIVES: Deferred cord clamping has been shown to prevent the deaths of preterm infants but concerns exist around those requiring resuscitation and randomised control trials are needed to assess the benefit and harms in this group of babies. Our research question is the 2nd highest priority for neonatal research in the UK. We aim to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of resuscitation with an intact cord. METHODS: Design: Multi--centre, two-arm, cluster randomised superiority trial Setting: Secondary & tertiary care maternity units with Level 2 or 3 neonatal intensive care units. Population: Very preterm babies <32 weeks’ gestational age requiring resuscitation at birth. Intervention: Bedside resuscitation with the umbilical cord intact for at least three minutes. Comparator: Resuscitation with the umbilical cord clamped and cut in the first 60 seconds. Primary outcome: Survival without severe brain injury at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age (PMA). Severe brain injury defined as Grade III or IV intraventricular haemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia. Secondary outcomes: Babies Survival at 36 weeks’ PMA, at 12- and 24-months of age corrected for prematurity (known as corrected age [CA]), Survival without moderate or severe neurodevelopmental impairment on parent-completed questionnaire at 24 months, sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, blood transfusions, hypotension, phototherapy, exchange transfusion. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the EQ-TIPS questionnaire at 12- and 24-months CA. Resource use at 6 weeks, 12- and 24 months Secondary outcomes: Mother Survival until hospital discharge, sepsis, post-partum haemorrhage, post-partum infection up to 7 days after birth Parents’ experience and satisfaction of intervention and trial and acceptability of resuscitation and cord management (6 weeks post-partum) Maternal health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and wellbeing collected using the EQ-5D-5L and ICE-CAP instruments at 6 weeks, 12- and 24-months?post-partum. Sample size: 2,422 babies from 46 sites in the UK. 10–16 international sites to realise a total sample size of 3,198–3,420. Analysis: Comparative analyses between groups will be intention-to-treat. A generalised linear mixed model will be used to compare survival without severe brain injury. Risk ratios and risk differences along with 95% confidence intervals will be presented. TIMELINES: Total 78 months (m): m1–12 set-up, m13–46 recruitment, m24 internal pilot, m55 primary and short-term outcome report, m78 follow-up report. Please see GANNT chart. IMPACT AND DISSEMINATION: Worldwide practice will be changed by the results either leading to intact cord resususcitation adoption or negating it. We will publish in peer reviewed, high impact journal and a NIHR monograph and present at national & international conferences. Social media platforms & websites of the trials unit, universities, collaborators, and partners including the neonatal charity Bliss will also publicise the results.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

What is the neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants at 2 years of age, who received placento-fetal transfusion at delivery?
Improving quality of care and outcome at very preterm birth
Endoscopic Lavage after Intraventricular Haemorrhage in Neonates in the UK: A national randomised controlled trial on the efficacy of neuro-endoscopic lavage (ENLIVEN-UK)
NeoCLEAR: Neonatal Champagne Lumbar punctures Every time - An RCT. A multicentre, randomised controlled 2x2 factorial trial to investigate techniques to increase lumbar puncture success
Outcome after Selective Early Closure of Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Preterm Babies (Baby-OSCAR trial)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.