Completed Mental Health Psychology & Behaviour

Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for the treatment of cannabis use disorders

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

No medication is currently approved for cannabis use disorder, and this project will compare existing treatments head-to-head to find which works best. Cannabis use disorder—the inability to stop using cannabis despite harm—affects a growing number of people as cannabis becomes more widely available. Psychosocial therapies (counselling, behavioural programmes) are the standard treatment, but they don’t work for everyone. Several drugs are being tested, but none have been licensed, leaving clinicians without clear guidance on what to prescribe. This project fills that gap by re-analysing data from two completed systematic reviews—one on medications, one on psychosocial treatments—using network meta-analysis. This statistical method allows the researchers to compare treatments that have never been directly tested against each other, drawing on indirect evidence from existing trials. If the analysis identifies a particular drug or therapy as clearly more effective, safer, or more acceptable to patients, it could directly inform clinical guidelines. For a condition with no approved pharmacotherapy, even a modestly effective medication would give doctors a new tool. The findings could also help the NHS decide which treatments to prioritise for commissioning, potentially improving outcomes for the estimated hundreds of thousands of people in the UK with cannabis use disorder.

View original technical description
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is characterized by habitual use, craving and inability to stop consuming cannabis even when it is causing physical or psychological harm. Psychosocial interventions are usually the first choice of treatment for CUD. While there is increasing interest in pharmacotherapies for CUD, none are yet approved. This project will involve a secondary analysis of data from two completed systematic reviews examining the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapies (NIHR165373) and psychosocial interventions (NIHR167862) for CUD in adults and young persons aged =16 years. The primary outcomes of interest are point and continuous abstinence from cannabis and level of cannabis use at the end of treatment, treatment completion, and (severe) adverse events. We will conduct network meta-analyses (NMA) to evaluate comparative effects of different pharmacotherapies, and different psychosocial interventions, within each treatment type. An additional NMA will evaluate comparative effects of both types of treatments, if pharmacotherapies and psychosocial interventions can be connected within the same network. This analysis approach overcomes limitations of pairwise meta-analysis and allows to make use of both direct and indirect evidence to estimate relative effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of different therapies for CUD.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Mechanisms of treatment seeking and recovery in cannabis use disorder
Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis
Cannabidiol: a novel treatment for cannabis dependence?
Towards a harm reduction approach to problematic cannabis use in schizophrenia
A Phase II RCT Of OrAl Cannabinoid Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral NeurOpathic PaiN (ACTION)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.