Completed Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions Public Health & Healthcare

Model: Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Pregnant women in the UK are currently screened for syphilis only once, in early pregnancy, but rising infection rates mean that a second test in the third trimester may now be needed. Congenital syphilis, passed from mother to baby during pregnancy, can cause lifelong harm including neurological damage, bone deformities, and hearing loss. In 2020, a cost-effectiveness model concluded that universal repeat screening was unlikely to be worth the cost, but that analysis relied on limited data and outdated incidence figures. Since then, syphilis cases have increased, and new UK surveillance data from the Integrated Screening Outcomes Surveillance Service (ISOSS) is now available. This project will rebuild and update that 2020 model using real UK data on maternal infection rates, screening uptake, treatment timing, and infant outcomes. The updated model will calculate the incremental costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and congenital syphilis cases prevented under a repeat screening programme. If the model shows repeat screening is cost-effective at standard NHS thresholds, the UK National Screening Committee could recommend adding a third-trimester syphilis test to routine antenatal care, potentially preventing dozens of severe infant infections each year.

View original technical description
Congenital syphilis (CS) occurs via vertical transmission of syphilis during pregnancy. In infants born with CS, the infection can lead to growth restriction and long-term sequelae, including neurological impairment, bone deformities, and hearing loss. Screening for syphilis is currently offered later in pregnancy (in the first trimester) as part of the NHS Infectious Diseases in Pregnancy Screening programme. This project assesses whether an additional screen for syphilis should be offered in the third trimester of pregnancy. In 2020, the UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) reviewed repeat screening and commissioned a cost-effectiveness model comparing universal third-trimester repeat screening with a single first-trimester screen. At that time, UK data on maternal syphilis incidence/prevalence and CS incidence were limited, requiring estimates from other sources. The 2020 analysis concluded that universal repeat screening was unlikely to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000–£30,000 per QALY, although results were sensitive to incidence assumptions (Aquarius Population Health, 2020). In 2024 the UK NSC received a request through the joint annual call submission from NHS England and the UK Health Security Agency to revise the cost-effectiveness analysis, as recent increases in syphilis incidence and in CS cases have been observed and UK data collected by the Integrated Screening Outcomes Surveillance Service (ISOSS) is now available. The Sheffield Evidence Network for Screening Synthesis (SENSS) will appraise the 2020 model and update its structure, parameters and evidence base. We will assess whether the prior model can be transparently reconstructed in Excel and identify where updated assumptions or restructuring are required (e.g., infection acquisition between screens, treatment effectiveness and timing, real-world care pathways and costs, and outcomes by gestational age). ISOSS data will be used where feasible to inform maternal syphilis incidence, screening uptake, test performance, pregnancy and infant outcomes (supplemented where appropriate by national perinatal surveillance sources), late presentation of CS, and treatment volumes. Where ISOSS is incomplete (e.g., missing stratification by screening status or incident vs prevalent infection), we will undertake targeted searches of peer-reviewed and grey literature, including modelling studies published since the most recent systematic review (Zhang et al., 2024). Cost inputs will be updated using NHS tariffs, the BNF and PSSRU indices. The updated model will adopt a lifetime time horizon and generate incremental costs, QALYs and CS outcomes for the recommended base case. We will conduct one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, as well as scenario testing to characterise parameter and structural uncertainty, including incidence and uptake thresholds relevant to UK implementation. References: Aquarius Population Health (2020) Repeat screening for syphilis in pregnancy as an alternative screening strategy in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Prepared for the UK National Screening Committee. Commissioned by Public Health England. Retrieved August 1, 2025, from UK National Screening Committee website: https://view-health-screening-recommendations.service.gov.uk/syphilis/ Zhang, M., Zhang, H., Hui, X., Qu, H., Xia, J., Xu, F., Shi, C., He, J., Cao, Y. and Hu, M., 2024. The cost-effectiveness of syphilis screening in pregnant women: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, p.1268653.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Addressing changes in the model: prostate cancer screening
Improving women's reproductive health by evaluating the impact of Chlamydia screening and M. genitalium testing on clinical outcomes
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of testing for Group B Streptococcus: a cluster randomised trial with economic and acceptability evaluations (GBS3)
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of technologies for testing and treating sexual partners of people with sexually transmitted infections: Evidence synthesis and mathematical modelling study
Suite of three rapid systematic reviews on incidence and natural history of all-cause and group B streptococcal (GBS) infection in the neonate, and on the clinical effectiveness of screening for maternal GBS carriage

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.