Active Public Health & Healthcare

Does continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during anaesthesia in older frail patients reduce harm and improve quality of life following major surgery?

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Two-thirds of patients experience dangerously low blood pressure during surgery, yet doctors lack clear evidence that preventing it with continuous monitoring actually improves long-term outcomes for the most vulnerable. This matters because older patients living with frailty—especially those undergoing hip fracture surgery—are at highest risk of organ damage and death from intra-operative hypotension. Current standard care uses intermittent blood pressure measurements, which can miss dangerous dips. Continuous arterial monitoring, established before anaesthesia, could catch these episodes, but no trial has proven it reduces harm or improves quality of life in this specific group. If this feasibility study succeeds, it will pave the way for a full-scale trial that could transform anaesthetic practice for frail older patients. The work also probes clinician attitudes and patient experiences, identifying real-world barriers to adoption. A positive result would give surgeons and anaesthetists a clear, evidence-based tool to protect the most vulnerable surgical patients from preventable injury—a quiet but critical improvement in how routine surgery is delivered to an ageing population.

View original technical description
Research question Does continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during surgery benefit patients who are high risk, particularly those who are older and living with frailty? Background Intra-operative hypotension (low blood pressure during surgery) occurs in two-thirds of operations and is associated with renal, cerebral and myocardial injury and mortality. Patients over 65 years old who are living with frailty are at elevated risk, including many patients requiring anaesthesia and surgery for a hip fracture. Emerging evidence suggests that continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during surgery, established before anaesthesia, may reduce exposure to intra-operative hypotension compared to intermittent blood pressure measurements. However, this has not been shown in older patients living with frailty nor demonstrated that prevention of hypotension reduces harm or improves quality of life. Aims To combine complementary work packages (WP) to synthesise evidence to ask: 'Does continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring during surgery benefit patients who are high risk, particularly those who are older and living with frailty?' Methods WP1: A systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate whether continuous blood pressure monitoring reduces exposure to intra-operative hypotension, perioperative morbidity, and mortality. The review will be prospectively registered with PROSPERO and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. WP2: Clinician attitudes towards continuous arterial monitoring in older patients living with frailty presenting for trauma surgery will be assessed through surveys and focus groups within a research framework. Key stakeholders will be purposively sampled to ensure a full range of opinions are captured. These will ascertain facilitators and barriers to continuous blood pressure monitoring in high-risk patients. WP3: We will undertake a feasibility study of continuous invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring vs standard care (intermittent blood pressure monitoring) in patients over 65 years old and living with frailty requiring hip fracture surgery. Up to 100 patients will be randomised (1:1) across four sites during 15 months of recruitment to continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring or standard care. We will collect feasibility data (including recruitment rate, treatment crossover, retention rate), baseline patient characteristics, intra-operative anaesthetic and surgical data, perioperative complications, adverse events, clinical outcomes and patient-reported quality of life at 120 days. The flow of participants will be reported in a CONSORT diagram, and outcomes will be summarised by group. A nested qualitative study will examine the experiences of patients, carers, and clinicians of the intervention and trial processes. Timelines for delivery The study will last 30 months, with WP1 and 2 completed within 24 months. WP3 will have a 6-month setup period, 15 months of recruitment, and 120 days of follow-up, allowing 5-6 months for analysis, report writing, and stakeholder events. Anticipated Impact and Dissemination The key impact will be determining whether a full trial is feasible- if so, we will progress to a researcher-led application. Data from all WPs will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals with open access. We will communicate directly with the Royal Colleges of Anaesthesia and Surgery and other relevant groups. At the end of the study, we will report back to our stakeholders.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Continuous ARterial monitoring in Elderly and Frail patients for hip fractUre surgery to prevent Low blood pressure: The CAREFUL Study
Evaluation of a continuous monitoring and multi-level feedback initiative to improve quality of anaesthetic care and perioperative workflow efficiency
WHiTE-LIT– World Hip Trauma Evaluation - Lidocaine Intravenous Trial: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial of the effect of intravenous lidocaine at the time of surgery on outcomes following hip fracture
A mixed-methods convergent parallel study into the impact of emergency laparotomy for older adults living with frailty
OSIRIS: Optimising Shared decision-makIng for high-RIsk major Surgery

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.