Recipient organisationUlster UniversitySource-published name: University of Ulster
FundingNot disclosed
PeriodMar 2031 — Mar 2031
In plain English
AI plain-English summary
Most research on Northern Ireland's physical barriers and contested spaces has focused on Belfast and Derry/Londonderry, leaving rural communities and market towns largely unexamined. This PhD project directly addresses that gap by studying how interface barriers—walls, fences, townland boundaries, and even community venues—shape division in smaller settlements. These architectural elements have both visible and invisible effects on residents' mindsets, behaviours, and sense of belonging, often reinforcing segregation long after the peace process. The research matters because policy on spatial division has historically ignored rural areas, despite evidence that fear and territoriality persist there across generations. If successful, this work could inform planning and community relations policies that currently overlook smaller towns and villages. It may help local authorities and architects design public spaces, housing developments, and community facilities that reduce rather than reinforce division. The project also aims to reveal how less visible forms of architecture—such as the layout of townlands or the location of social venues—continue to shape everyday life in ways that official policy has not yet addressed.
View original technical description
Despite the significant architectural and planning research that has been undertaken on interfaces areas, contested places and barriers, the majority of this work has been focused on the major urban centres. Rural communities in Northern Ireland, and smaller market-towns, have not attracted the same degree of scholarly attention. My PhD therefore seeks to directly address this gap in knowledge by examining the spatial and material role of interface barriers in Northern Ireland. They are architectural elements which can have both profound visible and invisible impacts on the mindsets and behaviours of communities living in close proximity and further afield. Research context Recent research on 'hidden barriers' (Coyles, Hamber and Grant, 2021) has helped to reveal the key role that less visible forms of architecture and space continue to play in both fostering physical division and reinforcing certain problematic social behaviours and attitudes. Coyles in his research refers to how such local politics influences policy in that 'Core to this argument, is the exposition of a problematic historical dichotomy where local forms of power play a fundamental role in unofficially shaping official forms of governance over architecture and space'. Factors such as fear and territoriality associated with the conflict in NI in communities are perhaps not fully recognised and remain in people's hearts and minds and are transferred through generations both consciously and subconsciously regardless of the progression of the peace process. While policy addressing architectural and spatial division has traditionally been focused on larger urban areas, particularly Belfast and Derry/Londonderry, there is a corresponding lack of policy attention paid to rural towns and communities. This is a significant research gap, as evidenced by the multifarious ways in which architecture and space are utilised to encourage and reinforce segregation and division in rural towns and communities: - Physical division, but rather than a wall or fence it may manifest itself through townlands and a patchwork quilt of communities, villages and even farms, or through the use of community and other venues. - Mindset division, mind mapping as affiliations differ and people feel a sense of belonging in communities; - Patterns of behaviour, as people from different background attend social, sporting, church or cultural organisations, and potentially shop and socialise in different areas or establishments depending on their background for a variety of reasons both proactive and reactive; - Background, as people from different ages, gender, racial background, sexual orientation or other categories interact differently with people from different religious/political background and have differing views and behaviours.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know