The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 is returning for two more rounds of testing, now that its members are in their mid-to-late eighties. This matters because we know very little about what happens to the brain and thinking skills after age 85, even though people in their late eighties are far more likely to need help living independently and face a higher risk of dementia than they did in their seventies. The cohort is unusually valuable: its members took cognitive tests as children, and researchers have already tracked them with repeated brain scans, genetic and lifestyle data from age 70 onward. Without continued funding, this data collection would stop mid-wave, and the chance to follow the same people into their late eighties would be lost for years. If the research succeeds, it will reveal which biological, psychological and social factors separate those who age well from those who decline. That knowledge could eventually guide efforts to maintain independence and quality of life in the oldest old. This is primarily fundamental science about the causes of cognitive ageing, but deeper understanding of what drives healthy ageing in the ninth decade could inform future strategies for reducing the burden of dementia and frailty.
View original technical description
As older people form an increasingly large proportion of human populations across the planet, greater resources will be needed for their management and care. Cognitive ageing, the process by which some cognitive abilities decline in older age, is of particular concern because it can lead to reduced quality of life, problems with daily tasks, a loss of independence, and, in its later stages, increased risk of dementia. Characterising the biological causes of cognitive ageing, and other related aspects of ageing, is therefore important if we are to reduce the burden of ageing at both the individual and societal level. By the time individuals are 85 years old, they are more likely to require assistance to live independently, and have threefold higher risk of dementia than in their 70s. However, we understand little about the brain and cognitive changes that come about at this age and beyond, and which factors might be most important to ameliorate this in future. In the proposal, we request funds to continue the COVID-delayed collection of a 6th Wave and add to it a 7th Wave of data collection from participants of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936), and to support core staff to enable this collection, and conduct the subsequent analyses from which many novel insights about ageing differences can be learned. The LBC1936 are a large group of relatively healthy community-dwelling older adults who are unique in having cognitive data from youth alongside other important early life data, ongoing linkage to health, administrative and mortality records, and repeat cognitive testing, brain ageing, genetic, epigenetic, lifestyle, psychological, social and other important information obtains from ages 70, 73, 76, 79, and 82 years old. Age UK had provided funds to complete collection of Wave6 (mean age 85 years), but COVID-delays mean that this funding period will now end mid-Wave 6. This is an important chance - for which we request minority core support - to continue this highly informative and productive interdisciplinary study which will extend the exceptionally detailed characterisation of participants for almost the entire 8th and 9th decades of life. A purely cross-sectional study with data at age 88 years (their mean age at Wave 7) with this level of data collection and expertise would be world-leading - it is extremely rare to have rich longitudinal data over a preceding 2 decades, plus critical information from much earlier in the lifespan. This longer period of follow up and the work proposed here will enable more precise detection of different aspects of ageing, more detailed ascertainment of those participants who do not return, and new insights into the unique contributions of multiple candidate factors that may determine healthy ageing. Importantly, alongside new data and hypotheses, this grant would also support stuff crucial for conducting these investigations. The study has a strong and diverse investigator team, and a strong track record in attracting scientists from a many disciplines, which brings with it additional funding, vital complementary expertise and new scientific discoveries. The hub-and-spoke model is reflected in the minority funding request - the School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences will also contribute 4 staff, with numerous collaborators and resources representing substantial added value. This is a vanishing window of opportunity to collect extensive data on adults aged 85 and 88 years old, who have also been deeply phenotyped across the 8th decade of life, and for whom rare early life and lifecourse data are also collected. The opportunity to collect such data again in future may not arise for many years.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know