Tiny silicon chips implanted near a tumour will measure its acidity, temperature, and protein levels to pinpoint when and where cancer is most vulnerable to treatment. Today, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are delivered on fixed schedules based on CT or MRI scans, and chemo circulates throughout the whole body, damaging healthy tissue. Doctors have no real-time way to track a tumour’s changing state between scans. This project aims to fill that gap by placing microsensors directly inside the body, next to the cancer, to monitor its activity continuously and precisely. If the chips work, treatment could shift from a one-size-fits-all schedule to a personalised, on-demand approach. Radiotherapy would be fired only when and where the tumour is most sensitive. The same chip platform could eventually release chemotherapy drugs locally, sparing the rest of the body. This would challenge how hospitals schedule treatments and how patients experience therapy, but it could dramatically improve outcomes. The work is primarily an engineering and chemistry challenge—building novel sensors, integrating them with wireless circuits on silicon, and protecting them from biological fouling. Social scientists are involved from the start to address ethics, regulation, and patient perception.
View original technical description
Cancer is a well-known and much-feared killer disease, accounting for over a million deaths each year in Europe alone. Currently, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are the primary forms of treatment. They are delivered on a regular (often weekly) schedule based on the experience of clinicians and the availability of equipment and staff for treatment, to locations that are determined by the results of CT or MRI scanning. Chemotherapy is generally administered systemically, either as an injection or orally and thus affects regions of the body that have nothing to do with the tumour. IMPACT(*) will develop tiny silicon chips to be placed inside the patient's body, close to a tumour to measure the cancer's "activity" very precisely in both space and time. The chips will measure simple quantities such as acidity, temperature and oxygen concentration and also more complex and difficult quantities such as the levels of particular proteins that indicate the status of the tumour and the death of cancer cells within it. They will concentrate on measuring the tumour's current vulnerability to radio- and chemo-therapy, and thus where and when that therapy should be targeted. With this knowledge, radiotherapy can be delivered to the right place and the right time to do maximum damage to a tumour. Similarly, by further developing a miniaturised, on-chip drug-delivery capability to protect its sensors from "biofouling", IMPACT paves the way for systems that can also administer chemotherapy to the right place and at the right time. The work in IMPACT is therefore designed to meet a clinical priority that has been stressed by cancer specialists. The scientific and technical challenges are, however to Chemists and (silicon) Engineers. Sensors must be developed, many of them entirely novel, which make the correct measurements. These sensors must then be placed on silicon, with all the support circuits, wireless communications and safety features that this implanted medical diagnostic and therapeutic system needs. IMPACT is therefore led by a team of engineers, chemists and both medical and veterinary clinicians. It also includes social scientists, as its results have the potential to revolutionise the way in which cancers are treated. IMPACT's implication is that the timing and location of treatment will be highly patient-specific. Careful consideration of the ethics, risks and regulation of such technology is vital from its inception as IMPACT's success will challenge both patients' perceptions and the organisation and scheduling of therapy. It will also save many lives. (*) Implantable Microsystems for Personalised Anti-Cancer Therapy.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know