Completed Clean Energy Engineering

Integrated Development of Low-Carbon Energy Systems (IDLES): A Whole-System Paradigm for Creating a National Strategy

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

The UK’s electricity, heating, transport, and gas systems are currently modelled in isolation, but their real-world interactions are growing tighter as the country decarbonises. This project builds a single, integrated computer model that simulates all these energy sectors together, including how people and businesses actually respond to price signals and incentives. Existing models can optimise electricity alone for cost, security, and emissions, but they cannot handle the complex feedback loops between, say, electric vehicle charging, home heating demand, and gas network pressures on a cold, windless evening. The team will combine engineering models of physical energy flows with machine learning on consumer behaviour, using data from partners including EDF Energy, Shell, National Grid, and ABB. If successful, the model will give government and industry a detailed, evidence-based tool to test investment decisions, design market incentives, and identify which new technologies to support. This could reshape how national energy strategy is planned, avoiding costly mistakes and ensuring the grid remains stable as it shifts toward low-carbon sources.

View original technical description
The long-term evolution of energy systems is set by the investment decisions of very many actors such as up-stream resource companies, power plant operators, network infrastructure providers, vehicle owners, transport system operators and building developers and occupiers. But these decisions are deliberately shaped by markets and incentives that have been designed by local and national governments to achieve policy objectives on energy, air-quality, economic growth and so on. It is clear then that government and businesses need detailed and dependable evidence of what can be achieved, what format of energy system we should aim for, what new technologies need to be encouraged, and how energy systems can form part of an industrial strategy to new goods and services. It is widely accepted that a whole-system view of energy is needed, covering not only multiple energy sectors (gas, heat, electricity and transport fuel) but also the behaviour of individuals and organisations within the energy consuming sectors such as transport and the built environment. This means that modelling energy production, delivery and use in a future integrated system is highly complex and analytically challenging. To provide evidence to government and business on what an optimised future system may look like, one has to rise to these modelling challenges. For electricity systems alone, there are established models that can optimise for security, cost and emissions given some assumptions (and sensitivities) and these have been used to provide policy and business strategy evidence. However, such models do not exist for the complex interactions of integrated systems and not at the level of fine detailed needed to expose particularly difficult operating conditions. Our vision is to tackle the very challenging modelling required for integrated energy systems by combining multi-physics optimising techno-economic models with machine learning of human behaviour and operational models emerging multi-carrier network and conversion technologies. The direction we wish to take is clear but there are many detailed challenges along the way for which highly innovative solutions will be needed to overcome the hurdles encountered. The programme grant structure enables us to assemble an exceptional team of experts across many disciplines. There are new and exciting opportunities, for instance, to apply machine learning to identify in a quantitative way models of consumer behaviour and responsiveness to incentives that can help explore demand-side flexibility within an integrated energy system. We have engaged four major partners from complementary sectors of the energy system that will support the programme with significant funding (approximately 35% additional funding) and more importantly engage with us and each other to share insights, challenges, data and case studies. EDF Energy provide the perspective on an energy retail business and access to smart meter trail data. Shell provide insights into the future fuels to be used in transport and building services. National Grid (System Operator) give the perspective of the use of flexibility and new service propositions for efficient system operations. ABB are a provider of data acquisition and control systems and provide industrial perspective of decentralisation of control. ABB have committed to providing substantial equipment and resource to build a verification and demonstration facility for decentralised control. We are also engaging examples of the new entrants, often smaller companies with potentially disruptive technologies and business models, who will engage and share some of their insights.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Adam Hawkes (Co-Investigator)Aruna Sivakumar (Co-Investigator)Billy Wu (Co-Investigator)Christos Markides (Co-Investigator)Goran Strbac (Co-Investigator)Iain Staffell (Co-Investigator)John Polak (Co-Investigator)Mirabelle Muuls (Co-Investigator)Nick Jennings (Co-Investigator)Nilay Shah (Co-Investigator)Richard Green (Co-Investigator)Robert Gross (Co-Investigator)Seth Flaxman (Co-Investigator)Tim Green (Principal Investigator)Wolfram Wiesemann (Co-Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Centre for Energy Systems Integration
Agent-based Modelling of Electricity Networks (AMEN)
Energy Revolution Research Consortium - Plus - EnergyREV - Next Wave of Local Energy Systems in a Whole Systems Context
Consortium for Modelling and Analysis of Decentralised Energy Storage (C-MADEnS)
Multiscale Modelling to maximise Demand Side Management (Part 2)

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.