Campaigns and school lessons about female genital mutilation (FGM) in the West Midlands may be using language that alienates the very families and community leaders they aim to reach. This matters because no research has ever examined the actual words, phrases, and sentence structures used in FGM education and awareness materials, or tested how audiences respond to them. With an estimated 12–16 per 1,000 women and girls affected in the West Midlands, and a UK-wide requirement to teach FGM in all schools, getting the language wrong risks disempowering communities rather than helping them make informed decisions. If this research succeeds, it will produce evidence-based guidance on what language works—and what backfires—in FGM communications. Schools, public health teams, and community organisations could then replace generic or alienating terminology with phrasing that communities find accessible and respectful. The practical outcome would be more effective prevention efforts, driven not by top-down messaging but by language that genuinely supports agency and informed choice among the people most affected.
View original technical description
Context Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a harmful practice that involves the partial or total removal of external female genitalia for non-medical reasons. It is estimated that more than 200 million girls and women globally have undergone FGM. In the West Midlands, 12-16 of every 1000 women and girls are affected. The practice, which is still rising, has serious health, psychological and social consequences. To raise awareness of FGM and to promote actions that will lead to its prevention, awareness-raising campaigns have been rolled out across the UK. In addition, there is a UK-wide requirement for FGM to be included in all educational settings. If these interventions are to be successful, it is important that the language used is accessible and acceptable to the recipients, including families and community leaders, as this is most likely to promote agency and empowerment, allowing them to make informed decisions and take appropriate actions. Challenge Despite the crucial importance of using the right language, no studies to date have explored the language that is used in educational settings and campaigns relating to FGM, and the impact that it has on its recipients. Nor have there been any investigations into how the efficacy of the language can be maximised. This is important because the lexical and grammatical choices made in crafting messaging in relation to FGM will have powerful consequences for audience interpretations and subsequent actions.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know