Completed Public Health & Healthcare Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions

Evidence Synthesis to inform health related decision making

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

When a new infectious disease emerges or a vaccine becomes available, health officials must combine data from dozens of separate studies—on who is sick, how the disease spreads, and which treatments work—before they can decide whom to vaccinate first or whether a drug is worth its cost. This research develops the statistical methods needed to weave together that messy, often incompatible evidence into a single coherent picture. Currently, decision-makers face studies with different designs, populations, and formats that cannot be directly compared. Without robust synthesis, policy choices risk being based on incomplete or misleading information. If successful, these methods will allow public health agencies and clinicians to make faster, more confident decisions about disease control and treatment funding. The work is fundamentally methodological—it does not study a specific disease or test a particular drug. Instead, it builds the analytical toolkit that underpins countless real-world health decisions, from vaccination campaigns to cost-effectiveness assessments for the NHS. Better evidence synthesis means fewer wrong turns when the next outbreak arrives.

View original technical description
In order to make decisions about management of diseases it is necessary to understand how diseases develop and spread and how interventions will impact on them. This often requires us to identify and combine many sources of information so that we can take robust decisions relevant to the clinical or public health context of interest. For example, when the objective is to control an infectious disease in the community we need to know how many people are affected by the disease (prevalence) and in which age groups; how it is currently spreading (incidence); how it is transmitted (transmission and infectivity); and the geographical location where the disease is more prevalent. This information will feed into relevant interventions, such as vaccination or treatment. This would require understanding to which subgroups of the population vaccination should be given first, or for which patients is a particular treatment cost-effective. Data on each of these aspects will typically come from several studies, possibly with different formats and not directly interpretable. Robust statistical methods are then needed to integrate such multiplicity of evidence in a coherent manner to make it useful input for decision making.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Informing Healthy Public Policy
Expected Value of Information and Synthesis Methods for Research Prioritisation and Study Design
Statistical inference in transmission models based on Bayesian synthesis of evidence from multiple sources
Bias-adjusted inference in Biostatistics
Estimating the impact of social structure on epidemics and predicting the impact of targeted interventions

Original classification

Intramural

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.