Active Lungs & Breathing Infection & Immunity

MICA: Mitochondrial dysfunction in macrophages and impaired bacterial clearance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

In people with COPD, the immune cells that should clear bacteria from the lungs instead fail to switch their energy production to a bacteria-killing mode. This failure leaves bacteria alive in the airways, driving repeated chest infections and worsening the disease. No current treatment can stop COPD from progressing, and the underlying cause of this immune defect is unknown. The researchers will compare macrophages from healthy non-smokers, current smokers, and COPD patients, tracking how these cells change their metabolism, produce mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and break their mitochondria into smaller units after encountering bacteria. They will also use mouse models and cells from people with genetic mitochondrial defects to pinpoint exactly which metabolic pathways go wrong. If they can identify the specific molecular steps that fail, they can screen drug libraries for compounds that restore the macrophages’ ability to kill bacteria. Such drugs could be tested in future trials to slow COPD progression—a disease that currently has no treatment to stop it.

View original technical description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease caused by inflammation and narrowing of the small airways, leading to breathlessness. COPD is triggered by cigarette smoke, but inflammation persists after stopping smoking and causes disease progression. Identifying what drives inflammation is vital since no treatment can stop progression. Frequent bacterial chest infections are associated with worsening COPD symptoms. We believe that ineffective clearance of bacteria from the airways causes COPD progression. We and others have found that in COPD, immune cells in the air sacs in the lung display faulty responses to bacteria that commonly cause chest infections resulting in bacteria persisting in the airway. These cells, termed alveolar macrophages (AM), are less able to eat and kill bacteria in people with COPD. We will examine why this happens. The process by which cells, such as AM, produce energy (metabolism) changes dynamically based on the cells function (e.g. killing bacteria). Our preliminary results suggest that COPD AM are less able to adjust their metabolism as needed, and this prevents bacterial clearance. Key parts of the cell involved in metabolism are mitochondria. Normally, after macrophages have eaten bacteria, the function of their mitochondria changes away from metabolism and towards producing substances to kill bacteria (mitochondrial reactive oxygen species; "mROS"). This requires the mitochondria to break up into smaller units ("mitochondrial fission"). Our work suggests that COPD AM normally produce too much mROS so cannot increase production to kill bacteria. We believe that in COPD, AM mitochondria are less able to adapt their function when trying to kill bacteria, leading to susceptibility to infection. However, the precise details of how these processes normally function, or go wrong in COPD, are not fully understood. A better understanding is needed to identify new treatments to enhance these processes in COPD. We will determine the key changes in metabolism, production of mROS and mitochondrial fission in macrophages required to kill bacteria effectively in healthy people and determine how COPD alters this response. To do this, we will study AM from the blood or lungs of healthy non-smokers, healthy current smokers, and people with COPD. We will isolate AM from the lungs by bronchoscopy, where a fibre-optic tube is passed into the airways and a segment of the lung is flushed with fluid to obtain the cells. We will also use mouse models of infection and airway disease. First, we will characterise in detail the metabolic response of AM to infection by isolating AM and labelling them with chemicals to track metabolism ("mass spectrometry"). We will measure patterns of genes and proteins involved in responding to bacteria, to identify metabolic pathways engaged during infection. We will confirm these metabolic responses in healthy AM and then determine how they are altered in COPD. Next, we will measure mROS production and investigate how it is produced following infection and in COPD AM. We will also examine the timing and mechanism of mitochondrial fission in these conditions. Our current findings suggest several potential mechanisms for mROS production and fission, and our analyses of metabolism and gene expression here will help determine which theories to test. Key findings from human cells will be validated in mouse models. We will also validate findings using macrophages derived from cells from people with genetic defects impacting mitochondrial function. We will use chemical and gene editing techniques in cells to modify pathways we have identified as altered in COPD that impact bacterial responses. Finally, to develop potential treatments we will screen libraries of drugs to identify ways of improving key responses. These will be tested in mouse models and patient samples to help prioritise approaches for future trials in COPD.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

David Dockrell (Principal Investigator)Moira Whyte (Co-Investigator)Sarah Walmsley (Co-Investigator)Stephen Renshaw (Co-Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Investigating impaired alveolar macrophage function in COPD: is the phenotype a consequence of defective cellular metabolism?
Novel airway epithelial cell signalling as a mechanism for driving macrophage dysfunction in COPD
Mechanisms, impact and therapeutic targeting of bacterial colonisation in COPD
Developing high content imaging of macrophages: potential drug discovery tool
Pathogenic airway macrophage adaptation in the chronically inflamed lung

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.