A single injection of a harmless virus carrying a corrected RNA code kept 77% of mice with Dravet syndrome alive past 100 days, compared to 36% of untreated mice. Dravet syndrome is a severe childhood epilepsy caused by a genetic mutation that disables a sodium channel critical for normal brain-cell firing. Current treatments cannot fix the underlying cause, leaving patients with life-long seizures, developmental delay, and a high risk of premature death. This project targets the root problem by editing the RNA message that cells use to build the faulty channel protein, rather than altering the DNA itself. If the therapy succeeds in humans, it could transform Dravet syndrome from a devastating, untreatable condition into one managed by a single treatment. The approach uses adeno-associated virus (AAV) to deliver RNA editing sequences directly to the brain, restoring the missing channel function. The researchers now plan to generate the safety and efficacy data needed to apply for a first-in-human clinical trial, guided by the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
View original technical description
Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe childhood epilepsy which leads to life-long disability. The disease becomes apparent in the first year of life, where babies present severe seizures (spontaneous & hyperthermia induced seizures), followed by developmental delay, behavioural, cognitive, and motor impairment and in some cases premature death. Approximately 90% of patients exhibit a spelling mistake, or mutation, in the genetic code of the SCN1A gene leading to loss-of-function of the voltage-gated sodium channel, Nav1.1. This channel is present in brain cells and allow normal firing patterns between these cells. The affected brain cells which contain the mutated Nav1.1 channel, results in abnormal firing. Thus, the disease manifests. Current treatments for Dravet syndrome are inadequate and ineffective. The process of making proteins in cells involves translating DNA (the genetic code) into RNA (the protein code) which is then made into proteins such as the Nav1.1 channel. We aim to develop a novel RNA editing therapy treatment for Dravet Syndrome, altering the protein code so more protein is made. Our approach involved delivering our RNA editing therapy using a virus called adeno-associated virus (AAV), to increase the healthy SCN1A gene expression and therefore restore the Nav1.1 function. We aimed to test this novel treatment in a DS mouse model. The DS mouse model, like the human DS patients, contain one functional gene and one-non-functional gene and show clinically relevant phenotypes such as, spontaneous seizures, hyperthermia induced seizures, behavioural abnormalities, and premature death. We developed 21 novel RNA editing sequences, of which 5 sequences showed to significantly increase healthy Scn1a (mouse gene equivalent) expression in cells. We selected two novel RNA editing sequences and produced AAV viral vector to test in the DS mouse model. The AAV gene therapy was delivered directly to the brain and systemically in the blood stream to new-born DS mice. The results showed that the first candidate AAV-mediated RNA editing treatment showed 77% survival over 100 days, compared to 36% for untreated DS mice. The second candidate did not show an increase in survival of treated DS mice. Therefore, we proceeded with candidate 1 for the remaining animal studies. Candidate 1 of AAV-mediated RNA editing therapy, showed a reduced tendency to hyperthermia seizures and a complete rescue of Scn1a expression in the brain region of DS treated mice. In this proposed project we aim to expand on our current proof of concept study and develop a clinically relevant AAV-mediated RNA editing treatment. With this funding and current scientific advice from Medical and Healthcare products regulatory agency (MHRA) we aim to have a robust pre-clinical efficacy and safety data to take forward to a first in human clinical trial
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know