Completed Plants, Animals & Ecology Food & Agriculture

iDeer: An Integrated Deer Management Platform

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Deer are eating the trees the UK needs to hit its net-zero target. The government wants to increase woodland cover from 13% to 18% of land area by 2050, but six deer species now browse young trees so heavily that they can stall forest growth across entire landscapes. The problem is that deer ignore property boundaries: fencing one wood can push deer onto a neighbour’s farmland, while planting trees in one place alters deer movement patterns elsewhere. Landowners often lack the scientific evidence to predict these knock-on effects. Project iDeer will build a free, interactive online tool that outputs “risk maps” showing how one landowner’s decision—say, creating a hectare of fenced woodland—will shift deer activity onto neighbouring land. Users can compare scenarios and adjust planting locations, fencing, or tree species accordingly. If successful, the tool could resolve a growing conflict between woodland creation targets and the landowners who bear the costs of deer damage, turning fragmented local actions into coordinated landscape-scale management.

View original technical description
Wild deer populations have increased dramatically throughout the northern hemisphere during recent decades. The UK is home to six deer species that can substantially impact the natural systems that we all depend upon. Capable of rapidly colonising newly created woodlands, deer can inhibit growth by browsing young trees, saplings, and seedlings. Consequently, deer present a serious challenge to the government's ambitious target to increase woodland area from 13% to 18% of UK land area and achieve net zero by 2050. It is therefore essential that people involved in woodland management plan for deer impacts. Whilst managing deer populations and designing planting schemes to mitigate their impacts is more important than ever, managing deer is challenging. They are highly mobile animals that cross man-made boundaries, and their local foraging decisions are driven by environmental characteristics of the broader landscape. Consequently, local management actions on a single property can elicit effects that cascade across entire landscapes and influence deer impacts on land elsewhere. For example, fencing a woodland might displace deer to neighbouring farmland, or planting trees locally will alter woodland cover and configuration at the landscape scale, influencing deer movement and impacts elsewhere. Rural landscapes across England and Wales are comprised of patchworks of land uses and landowners with varying and even conflicting management objectives, including different views on deer. Indeed, while considered a 'pest' to many landowners, deer are culturally and economically valued by others. In such situations, woodland creation and management decisions that influence deer behaviour and foraging preferences are necessary to ensure successful woodland expansion. These decisions could include, for example, where to locate new woodlands, fencing, alterations to woodland tree species and structure, or the provision of alternative food resources or deer repellents. However, landowners may not be aware of these options, their effectiveness, or the scientific evidence behind them. Indeed, while scientific understanding of deer ecology, impacts and mitigation is evidenced by a vast literature from across the temperate zone, much remains to be done to translate this knowledge into management practice, in a way that integrates local expertise and multiple stakeholder objectives. Project iDeer has been designed to address this incorporation and implementation gap. Project iDeer will deliver a co-designed interactive decision support tool - the 'iDeer tool' - to facilitate strategic woodland creation and management that minimises deer impacts on new and existing woodland and other neighbouring land uses in England and Wales. Landowner consultations from previous projects have established a clear desire for digital decision support tools that integrate local with scientific knowledge to inform land management plans. The iDeer tool will output 'risk maps' that enable users to see how choices in woodland management made by one landowner will influence deer activity on neighbouring land and the wider landscape. For example, how the creation and fencing of one hectare of woodland on one land parcel might increase crop disturbance by deer on the neighbouring land parcel. Users will be able to output and compare these risk maps enabling them to make informed decisions about how to manage their land whilst also considering impacts on neighbours and the wider landscape. We propose to bring together an interdisciplinary team with collective expertise in woodland and deer ecology, conservation conflict, animal behaviour modelling, social science methods and web tool development. Solutions-focussed from the start, we will work with stakeholders that are involved in woodland and/or deer management, including farmers, woodland managers, public forestry bodies, and conservation practitioners, to ensure that the iDeer tool will achieve its aim.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Chloe Bellamy (Co-Investigator)Felix Eigenbrod (Co-Investigator)Freya St. John (Co-Investigator)Graeme Shannon (Co-Investigator)Rebecca Spake (Principal Investigator)Robin Gill (Co-Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A rapid assessment tool for Woodland Creation investment
Intelligent Deer Deterrent System with Advanced Monitoring Dashboard for Railway Protection (ADDS)
University of Hull and Deer Initiative
Using remote imaging and machine learning tools to quantify ecological effects of red deer (Cervus elephas) in Scotland
BEE-STEWARD: A decision-support tool for land owners, managers and advisors to support pollinator populations on farmland

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.